descriptive law
(kirjeldav õigus) -
laws which simply describe how people or
even natural phenomenas
usually behave
nation (riik)
-
country with its own goverment
citizen
(kodanik) -
person native of a country; realationship
between country
and a person
stranger
(välismaalne) - person who is unfamiliar, from
another country
penalty
(
karistus ) - punishment
fixed by law, as for a
crime or from any
soical groups
goverment
(valitsus) - organization which controlls a stre or community
System
of Courts (
kohtusüsteem )
- organization
applying law in the name of
states to commit a crime (
kuritegu läbi viima) - breaking a law, usually
given out by the goverment
fine (
trahv )
- certain sum of
money person pays for breaking a law
corruption
(korruptsioon) - dishonest or unethincal conduct by a person
entrusted with a
position of
authority suspension
(kõrvaldamine) - form of punisment that people recieve for violating
rules and regulations
Civil Action (tsiviilhagi)
- lawsuit between two private
parties prosecution
(süüdistus) - the institution and carrying on of
legal proceeding
against a person
injury
(
vigastus ) - an act or event that
causes someone /
something no longer
to be fully healthy
claim
(nõudeõigus) - to
apply for compensation or to inherit something
prison
(
vangla ) - residence for incaretaking
criminals majority
(enamus) -
greater amount of the group
public opinion (avalik
arvamus) - collective opinion of many people on
same issue , problem
etc.
Seperation of Power (võimude
lahusus ) -
division of responsibilites into distinct branches to
limit any
branch from excersising the
core functions of another
(legislative,
executive ,
judicial )
pressure group (surve
gurpp) - an
interest group that
attempts to
influence legislation ,
for example
through propaganda dangerous driving (ohtlik
sõitmine) - a way of driving that threats
other ’s
safety or life
international law
(rahvusvaheline
õigus) -
body of rules that nations recognize as binding in their
coundct towards one another
operating law (õigusega
töötamine) - ensuring obidieance to
regulation ; to have the
rights to impliment justice on
others political structure
(poliitiline struktuur) -
institutions or groups and their relations to each
other within political
systems as they constitute the political landscape of the
political entity
social values (sotsiaalsed
väärtused) - larger concept which includes the subjective aspects
of the citizens' well-being,
such as their ability to participate in
making decisions that
affect them civil war (kodusõda)
- (armed) conflict between politicalfactions or religions within
same
county industrialization
(industrialiseerimine) - a large-scale
introduction of manufacturing
occupation
(okupatsioon) -
permanent trade, profession, empouement,
bussiness or
means of livelihood or possession of
real property or use of a
thing court ruling (kohtumäärtus)
- a
decision made by court
precendent
(pretsedent) - judicial decision that serves as an authority for
deciding a
later (
similar )
case equity
(
õiglus ) - system of jurisprudence
founded on principals of natural
justice and
fair conduct
to appeal (edasi
kaebama ) - application or proceeding for review by higher court to
change precious decision
to solve a dispute
(konflikti
lahendama ) -
finding a solution to a conflict
to force someone (kedagi
sundima) - making someone act in some way against their own will
to fulfill a contract
(lepingut täitma) -
to complete the obligations from the contract that were given to each
party to pay damages (
kahjutasu maksma) - sum of money needed to be
paid for the loss
beneficiary
(
kasusaaja ) - person entiteled to recieve fund or other property
under
trust , will or
insurance policy avoid taxes (makse
vältima) - legally finding a way to pay less for dues
evidence
(tõestusmaterjal) - information drawn from personal testimony, a
document , or material
object , used to establish facts in a legal
investigation or admissible as testimony in law court
inherit
(pärima) - gain a possession of someone’s
death to challenge a decision
(otsust vaidlustama)
- questioning the
truth behind someone’s decision
sequel ideology (ideoloogia
järg ) - principle of the seperation of goverment institutions and
persons mandated to
represent the state from
religious institutsion
criminal code
(kriminaalseadustik) - a document which complies all or significant
amount of particulal crimnal law
unbiased
(erapooletu) - to be fair and likely not
support particular party of
the case
consumer
(tarbija) - an indicual who purchases
services and merchandises
binding agreement (siduv
kokkulepe) - an agreement in writing between two or more individuals
or entities in which a court can
impose penalties in case one party
does not fulfill the obligations
tort
(seadusevastane tegu) - a civil
wrong , intentional or not, from which
injury occurs to another
reputation
(reputatsioon) - person’s
good name,
honor or what the community
thinks of him/her
property (vara)
- something that is
owned by a person (bussiness, land,
building etc)
to administer property (vara
haldamine) - to
manage some kind of property (bussiness, land,
building, real
estate )
family law (perekonnaõigus)
- an area of the law
that deals with
matrimonial
matters and
domestic relations (
marriage , civil unions,
child abuse,
divorce ,
adoption)
unjust enrichment (alusetu
rikastumine ) - when a person unfairly
gets a
benefit by
chance ,
mistake or another's misfortune
legal remedies
(õiguskaitsevahendid)
- the way a right is enforced by a court of law when wrongful act is
imposed upon another
individual procedure (menetlus)
- the
official and
proper way of doing things in a legal case in
certain way or
order victim (ohver)
- a person who has been attacked, injured, robbed, or
killed by
someone
else .
beyond reasonable doubt (väljaspool
mõistlikku kahtlust) - the standard that must be met by the
prosecution's evidence in a criminal prosecution: that no other
logical explanation can be derived
on the blanace of
probabilities (tõenäosuse
tasakaalul põhinev) - the standard of
proof in civil
cases ,
demanding that the case that is the more probable should succeed
(51%)
suspect
(kahtlusalune) - a person believed to have committed a crime
plaintiff
(
hageja ) - someone who brings a lawsuit against someone into civil
court
defendant
(
kostja ) - a person being sued or accused of a crime
admissible as evidence
(tõenduskõlblik) -
evidence which is
found useful in helping the trier of
fact and
lawfully obtained
trespassing
(eramaale sisse
tungima ) - the act of
walking on
private property
offence
(
väärtegu ) - wroungful act; act against law
negligence
(hooletus) - carelessness or not paying
attention , causing someone or
something to be at risk of being harmed
to qualify (kvalifitseeruma)
- to be entitled to something or to fit the
requirements of something
the right of audience (???)
- a right of a
lawyer to appear and conduct proceedings in court on
behalf of their client
to draw up a will
(testamenti
koostama) - to
compose a legal document that tells what a person
wants to have
done with their property after their death
legitimation
(seadustamine) - according to law; lawful
professional title
(kutsenimetus) - a
word that is used before someone’s name,
stating their social rank,
qualification
law- firm (õigusbüroo)
- a business formed by one or more lawyers to
engage in the
practice of law
liable (kohustatud)
- legally obligated or
responsible stock market
(aktsiaturg) - a system or program by which the buying and
selling of
stocks is conducted
transaction
(tehing) - an exchange, or an
instance where business is done or
something is bought or sol
legal profession
(
advokatuur ) - the
body of individuals qualified to practice law in particular
jurisdiction
welfare right (heaolu
õigus) - the legal entitlement to services
provided for in social
policy
immigration
(immigratsioon) - relocating permanently to a
foreign country; the
number of people entering a country or
region during a specified
period
fee playing client (tasu
maksev
klient ) - person who pays directly for the
service subsidise
(toetus) - to support
financially political crime
(poliitiline kuritegu) - an offence involving
acts which prejudice
the interest of state, its goverment, or the political system
emergency
(hädaolukord) - sudden, unexpected situation that causes the need to
take immediate action
to be entiteled to do
something (õigus
millegi tegemiseks) - to have a right to do or have something
goverment funded legal aid
(valitsuse rahastatud õigusabi) - money given to people who are
unable to affor legal repesentation and acess to the court system
to regulate competence
(pädevude
regulatsioon ) - to
control or adjust adequacy
professional examination
(ametialne
eksam ) - a test taken in order to get qualification for
certain occupation
preparorty course
(ettevalmistus kursus) - a
class which will prepear person for
certain
subject ’s examination
to sue somebody
(kedagi kohtusse kaebama) - to file a lawsuit agains someone who
commited a crime
to be impartial
(erapooletu) - to
treat rivals or disputants equally
to prove quilt
(
süüd tõestama) - to demonstrate the truth of that someone has
commited a special offence or crime
to transfer
(ülekandma) - to
move , carry or transport from one person or
place to another
original court
(algupärane kohus, I astme kohus) - the court where case is heard
for the
first time
appellate court
(apellatsioonikohus) - higher level court which hears the appeals
from orginal court
jurisdiction
(kohtualluvus) - the power or authority to decide legal cases
criminal matter
(kriminaal asi) - wrongful act that is
considered unacceptable and
described in Penal Code
to adjudicate on the dispute
(kohtuotsust
langetama konflikti kohta) - judicially making a
decision about who is right
amount of the
claim
(nõude summa) - amount payable on the maturity of a policy or when a
claim is raised
probate
(testamendi kinnitamine) - to establish that a will is valid
divorce
(
lahutus ) - legal
ending to a marriage; complete separation
Roman law
(
Rooma õigus) - the code of laws of
ancient Rome: the
basis for the
modern legal system in many countries
single judge
(üksik
kohtunik ) - judge who hears the case alone
sitting without a jury
(istung ilma vandemeesteta) - case in court solved only by a judge
respondent
(kostja, küsitletav) - someone who answers something, or the
defending party in a law case
matrimonial matters
(abieluasjad) - things in law which relate to marriage and family
guardianship
(eestkoste) - person who has or is entitled or legally appointed to
the care and managment of the person or propert of another person
adoption
(adopteerimine) - act or
process in which case obligations and right
of a child are given to new family
illegitimate children
(abieluvälised lapsed) -
kids born
outside the marriage
leave
(luba) - permission to do something
consent
(nõusoleks) - to
agree to do or
allow something
to overturn something
(midagi ümberpöörama) - to decide that something is wrong and
change it
presonal injury case
(kehaline/mentaalne vigastuse juhtum) - legal term for damage to the
body, mind or
emotions , as opposed to damage to property
the amount of damages
awarded (määratud
kahjutasu) - sum of money, given to the plaintiff, victim to punish
someone (defendant)
remedy
(abinõu) - the way a right is enforced
wronged party
(ülekohut saanud osapool) - indivual who has been treated unfairly
or unjustly
wrongdoer
(kurijategija) - person who has done something that is morally or
legally wrong
wrongful conviction
(väär süüdimõistmine) - punishing someone for a crime they did
not actually commit
domesti violence
(koduvägivald) - the
affliction of physicall pain against another
person in intimate
relationship such as marriage and dating
shoplifiting
(poevargus) - to steal things from a
store aggrieved shopkeeper
(kahju saanud poeomanik) - store owner who ha suffered from unfair
treatment
decision to prosecute
(süüdistusotsus) - deciding wether
there is a reasonale prospect of
conviction
conflict of interest
(huvide konflikt) - situation in which a person or
organisation is
involved in many interests, financial or otherwise, one of which
could possibly corrput
motivation or decision-making of that
indivudal or oganisation
to drop charges
(süüdistusest loobuma) - dismission of a case (evidence,
reevulation of evidence, failure of witnesses to cooperate)
overburden
(ülekoormus) - to give someone or something too much
work discretion
(
valikuvabadus ) - the power or right to decide or act according to
oneõs own judgment
caution
(ettevaatus) - a spoken official warning given to wrongdoer who has
not commited as
serious crime
public interest
(avalikhuvi) - the well-being of the general public,
commonwealth (to issue) formal warning
(
ametlikku hoiatust
väljastama) - making a recorded warning with consequences
know to
the wrongdoer
summary offence (väärtegu)
-
petty crime which is heard by magistrate alone, no jury
trial needed, wrongoder does not have to be present in the hearing (minor
assault, property damage, offensive behaviour)
motoring offence
(sõiduvahendiga
sooritatud kuritegu) - a crime commited which
concerns driving
excess of jurisdiction
(jurisdiktsiooni
ületamine) - court’s
acting beyond the
limits of its power
indictable offence
(kuritegu) - serious
crime which is ruled by jury and with enough evidence, wronger will
be charged with felony (
aggravated burglary, indecent aussalt,
murder , arson)
to conduct a preliminary enquiry (eeluurimine)
- to
collect enough evidence to prove the case which then will be
commited to trial
to discharge the case
(juhtumit tühistama)
- in case of not enough evidence to prove the case it will not be
taken into trial
to pass sentence
(kohtuotsust
väljakuulutama) - to officially say in court of law what a
criminal’s punishment will be
to insist on something
(midagi nõudma) -
to
demand something to
happen or someone to do something to presuade
adjudication
(kohtuotsus) - the legal process of resolving a disupute
limited jurisdiction
(piiratud
pädevus ) - power of a court to
hear certain
types of cases
employer
(
tööandja ) - a person or institution that hires
workers employee
(töövõtja) - someone who is
working for company, organisation,
person or communty
welfare system
(hoolekandesüsteem) -
provision of minimum well-being
dismissal
(vallandamine) - the end of an employee’s contract with employer
expert assessor
(eksperthindaja) - professional assisstant in a fiel to a judge or
magistrate
judging panel
(
kohtunikekogu ) - set of judges who hear a case of action
judicial review
(juriidiline läbivaatus) - a higher’s courts examination of a
lower court’s factual or legal findings
legal aid
(õigusabi) - money provided by a special organization to pay the
legal fees for people who can not pay for it themselves
commerical disputes
(
kaubanduslikud konfliktid) - any disagreement two or more
bussinesses
supplier of good and
services (teenuste
ja kaupade tarnija) - someone who provides/
orders products and
offerst assistance
consumer
(tarbija) - someone who buys good and services from supplier
independent third party
(iseseisev kolmas osapool) - individual who is not
part of the actual
dispute, but has the
knowledge to decide on which party is right
to take place in private
(privaatselt aset leidma) - to occur when no one else is present
natual justice
(loomuõigus) - to
concern procdural fairness and ensure a fair
decision is reached
award
(otsus) - the decision made by arbitrator
trade association
(kaubandusühik) - group of people or
companies in particular
bussiness organized to promote common interest
deposit
(
hoius ) - moey paid as an earned or securty for the contract; placing
money into
bank two- tier system
(kahetasemeline süsteem) - court with 2 levels
access to justice
(juurdepääsetavus õigusele) - a right to seek and obtain legal aid
attorney
(
advokaat ) - someone who is legally qualified to prosecute and defend
actions in court
prosecutor (
prokurör )
- an official in
charge of prosecutinh
important cases
judge
(kohtunik) - a public officer chosen or elected to administer law
barrister -
counselor who is learned in law and who has been accepted into Bar
solicitor (vandeadvokaat) - lawyer who handles primary office work
Bar
(advokatuur) - collective of lawyers working in legal
field applicable
(kohaldatav) - capable of being applied, relevant or appropriate
distinguish
(
eristama ) - to argue that the
rule in one appeals court decision
does not apply to particular case
although there is an appearant
simalarity
cite
(
viitama ) - to make
reference to a decision in another case to make a
legal point in argument
Procedual law
(menetlusõigus) - the body of law that prescribes formal steps to be
taken in enforcing legal rights.
Substantive
law
(materjaalneõigus) - the part of the law that creates, defines, and
regulates rights; the
essential substance of rights under law.
decree
(seadlus) - a decision or order of
government or judicial body
eligible (valitav)
- capable of being chosen
fair trial
(õiglane kohtupidamine) - parites are treated equally by independent
and
biased judges
code
(seadustik) - a
collection of laws
libel matters
(kirjalik laim) - in written text saying terrible things another
person
slander matter
(
suuline laim) - to say terrible things about someone verbaly
sole proprietor
(füüsiliselt isikust
ettevõtja ) - person who owns business,
distinguished from a partnership or corporation
1. Prescriptive and descriptive law
Some laws are descriptive: they simply describe how people, or
even natural phenomena, usually behave. Some laws are prescriptive:
they prescribe how people ought to behave.
In all societies, relations between people are regulated by
prescriptive law out of which some are customs – informal rules of
social and moral behaviour. Breaking
these rules may
lead to
penalties.
Governments are
motivated to make and
enforce laws because of
various
reasons : social control, implementation of justice and
common sense. Although making and enforcing laws is a way for
government to show their power, they also combine many
purposes and
inherit many
traditions . When governments make laws, they use a
system of courts backed by the power of the
police to enforce these
laws.
The laws made by the government of one country are often very
different from the laws of another country and because of that it is
difficult to write a general introductory book about law
today . Laws
are different in every country mostly because of the culture
differences and historical background.
Government - organization
which controls a state or community
Penalty - punishment fixed by
law, as for a crime or from any soical groups
Justice - the
process or
result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and
criminals
Law - a rule made by the government of a town, state,
country, etc.
System of Courts - organization applying law in the
name of states
Enforce - to compel someone to abide by a rule,
law or order.
___________________________________________________________________
2. Sources of law (general)To
understand why country has a particular legal system, it is
necessary to
look at its history, political structure and social
values. One of the sources of law is precedent. It means that if a
similar dispute has been resolved (solve a dispute) in the past, the
court is
bound to
follow the reasoning and
reach the same decision.
Precedents are more used in common law countries.
Custom can be also a source of law. Customs are non-written
rules of social and moral behaviour. In history, when the laws were
not written yet, the life was organised by customs. The most
important source of law is legislation (a law or set of laws
suggested by a government and made official by a
parliament ).
Legislature frames new laws, amends the old laws and cancels existing
laws in all countries.
Political structure -
institutions or groups and their relations to each other within
political systems as they constitute the political landscape of the
political entity
Social values - larger concept which includes
the subjective aspects of the citizens' well-being
Amend - to
modify or alter something
___________________________________________________________________
3. Common law
Common law has
developed through the history and originates back
to the
11th century ’s
England . Travelling judges moved
around the
country solving different criminal cases and civil disputes. The
most important part of common law is precedent. It means that in case
essential
elements of the case are the same as in
previous recorded
cases, judges are bound to reach same verdict. Government passing new
legislations if they
feel existing common law, statues or equitable,
help courts to avoid the obligation to use precedent.
Common law used to be divided into two: common law, equity.
Equity cases were not enforced as common law and was mostly used to
make someone do something, such as force someone to follow
obligations of the contract. Common law has
spread all over the
world because of the
once owned
colonies of
Britain , especially
Unites States. Judges in common law
cannot directly support their
decisions by cases from another county, but it is permissible to note
such evidence.
Verdict
– decision reached
Judge – person who adjudicates on
disputes, resolves disputes
Legislation - laws and rules made by
the government
Statue - a rule of conduct or action laid down by
a governing authority and especially a legislature
Equity -
system of jurisprudence founded on principals of natural justice and
fair conduct
Obligation - something one must do because of
prior agreement
____________________________________________________________________
4. Continental law
Continental systems are
known as codified legal systems.
Continental law lawmakers were often influenced by
canon law of the
Roman Catholic
Church , but the most important models were the codes
from 7th century under the direction of the Roman Emperor Justinian.
It has resulted from attempts by government to produce a set of
codes to govern every legal aspect of a citizen’s life. Legislators
find it more important to speculate human behaviour
rather than previous cases. Many countries have looked to the example of France
when codifying their laws.
Revolutionary France
wanted to break with
case law, which often produced corrupt and biased judgments.
Lawmakers in nations want to show that their citizens’ legal
rights originate in the state and not in
local customs and state
makes laws not court. To separate the roles of the legislature and
judiciary , it was necessary to make laws clean and comprehensive.
Biased - unfairly showing favoritism towards something or someone
Judiciary - a person or thing associated with a court of law or
judges
____________________________________________________________________
5. Civil lawCivil law concerns disputes
among citizens within a country. Main
categories of
English civil law are: contracts (binding agreements
between individuals, companies), torts (wrongs committed against a
person, individual’s property, or reputation), trusts (arrangement
to administer property for another person’s benefit), probate
(arrangement to deal with property after owner’s death), family
law.
In Estonia civil law categories are usually: law of property, law
of obligations, family law, law of succession, commercial law,
intellectual property law, private international law.
In civil law plaintiff brings case against defendant into court and
has to prove case “on the
balance of probabilities”. Court will
weigh all the evidence and decide what is most probable. Once
plaintiff has shown that the defendant is liable, the main argument
in civil court is about the amount of money or damages, which the
defendant should pay to the plaintiff.
____________________________________________________________________6. Public law
Public law concerns disputes between citizens and the state, or
between one state and another. The main categories of public law are:
crimes (wrongs which are considered to
harm the well-being of society
in general), Constitutional Law (regulation of how the law itself
operates) and International Law (regulations of relations between
governments and private citizens of one country and another).
In Estonia the main categories are: constitutional law,
administrative law, tax law, penal law and procedural law.
In public law prosecution brings case against defendant into
court and has to prove the guilt “beyond reasonable doubt”.
Standards of proof in public law cases are usually high, because
defendant does not only face financial penalties, he or she might
also be convicted or even executed.
Defendant can be made to pay for all the proceedings and court
can also decide the awarded damages to the victim
Crimes –
illegal or immoral
activities Prosecution – criminal court proceeding against someone
Guilt – the state of
having broken a law
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
7. Classification of courts (general)
Courts can be classified according to their functions. Usually
there are two
ways to classify them.
Courts can be classified as courts of civil and courts of
criminal jurisdiction. Civil courts solve the disputes between
individuals and in criminal courts the parties are a individual and
state.
Courts can also be divided into original and appellate
jurisdictions. The court where case is first heard is called original
court, also known as court of first instance. In almost all cases it
is possible to appeal to a higher court for reconsideration of the
decision of the original courts to appellate courts.
It is important to
remember that these two classifications are
not always valid. There are courts which
exercise jurisdiction in
civil and criminal cases. Also not all the courts have appellate
jurisdiction, like for example magistrate’s jurisdiction. The
European court itself is completely independent classification of
courts.
Jurisdiction - the power or authority to decide legal cases
____________________________________________________________________
8. Civil courts (general+your home country)
Civil courts deal with civil actions (an official
complaint , made
by a person against another person who is said to have done sth to
harm them). Civil actions take place between two or more individuals
in dispute (an argument or disagreement). Civil courts make
adjudications (to make a formal decision about something) on these
disputes. Some disputes are more serious and
complex than others. The
jurisdiction (the authority of an official organization to make and
deal with especially legal decisions) of the courts is limited by the
type of the case, by the
geography and the amount of the claim (the
sum of payable at the maturity of an insurance policy or upon death
of the person insured to the beneficiary or the legal heir of the
insured).
In Estonia civil actions are dealt with in county courts (a local
law court which deals with less serious disputes). In civil procedure
(a set of actions which is the official or accepted way of doing
something) there can be three parties: plaintiff, defendant and third
party
whose rights the dispute can concern. The decision of county
court can be appealed to the
circuit court (second instance court).
____________________________________________________________________
9. Criminal courts (general+your home
country)
The
purpose of the criminal courts is to determine if the
accused person has committed a crime and punish the lawbreaker
(wrongdoer). It is important to
protect the society and punish only
persons who are guilty of a crime. The burden of proof (the
obligation of proving) is on the prosecutor to prove beyond
reasonable doubt that the accused (a person who is maybe guilty of a
crime) committed a crime. In England children and the young persons
who are accused of committing a crime are tried without a jury (a
group of people who have been chosen to listen to all the facts in a
trial in a law court and to decide whether a person is guilty or not
guilty).
In Estonia, the first-
degree crimes are dealt with in county
courts. Less serious crimes are dealt with by a judge. In criminal
proceeding, there are public prosecutor, defendant and a person who
is harmed in some way by the crime. The decision of a court can be
appealed to the circuit court.
____________________________________________________________________
10. Classification of offences (general)
After the decision to prosecute the case will eventually be heard
in courts. Like civil actions, criminal offences
vary in seriousness
and
complexity .
One of the way to classify offences is to
divide them into
first-degree and seconddegree offences. Main difference between these
two is that first-degree offences are intentional, while
second-degree offences are unintentional. Other way to classify
offences is to divide them into felonies and misdemeanours, also
known as crimes against objects.
Most common way is to divide criminal into 3 types of offences.
Summary offences which are the less serious offences, such as
motoring offences, and do not requier a jury to make a decision.
Indictable vases are the most serious offences in which enough
evidence is collect is sent to trial. Triable offences are triable in
either way and can be commited in minor or serious way.
____________________________________________________________________
11. Classification of offences (your home
country)
In Estonia, there are two groups of offences (an illegal act; a
crime): misdemeanors (a crime considered to be one of the less
serious types of crime) and crimes (an illegal act).
Misdemeanors can be tried by court (a place where trials and
other legal cases happen) or by a body conducting extrajudicial
proceedings. The main punishment for misdemeanor is a fine or arrest
(if the police arrest someone, they take them
away to ask them about
a crime that they might have committed). The lawbreakers must pay
12-1200
euros or they can be arrested for 1-30
days . Arrest can be
sentenced (a punishment given by a judge) only by a court. Legal
persons (a company that has
full legal rights and responsibilities
according to the law) may be imposed fines ranging from 32 to 32,000
euros.
Crimes can be first and second degree crimes. The first-degree
crimes are the most serious and can be penalized (to punish someone)
by imprisonment (to put into prison) over 5
years or a life
imprisonment. Imprisonment can penalize second degree crimes up to 5
years or a fine.
____________________________________________________________________
12. Civil procedure
Civil law, or private law, concerns disputes among citizens within
a country. The main categories of civil law are contracts, trusts,
probates, and family law.
Crimes in civil procedure which have been committed against an
individual are called torts and are tired in civil courts. Tort can
result without intent to cause harm on the wrongdoer’s part. Torts
are for example: trespassing, invasion of privacy and fraud. Party
bringing the civil action is called plaintiff and the other party is
known as defendant. Plaintiff is required to prove his or her case on
the balance of probabilities. Victim can pursue his or her claim for
compensation.
Court will weigh all the evidence and decide what is most
probable. Once the plaintiff has shown that the defendant is liable,
the main argument in civil court is about the amount of money or
damages which the defendant should pay to the plaintiff.
____________________________________________________________________
13. Criminal procedure
Criminal law, or public law, concerns disputes between citizens
and the state or between two states. The main categories of public
law are crimes, Constitutional Law, and International Law.
Crimes in criminal law are wrongs committed against society and
are tired in criminal courts. Crime
requires a criminal intent (mens
rea). Crimes are for example: assassination, kidnapping, statutory
rape .
Party bringing the criminal action is called prosecution and
other party is known as defendant. Prosecution must prove the guilt
of a criminal beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal court may force a
defendant to pay the legal costs of the prosecution or compensations
to victim.
Standards of proof are high
since the
loser risks not only with
financial penalties, but also being convicted or even to be executed.
Wrongdoers can receive also
sentences such as:
custody , community
orders, fines, discharges
Custody - care of a person or thing, generally under court orders, or
the state of being
held by force Discharge - to release, unload or
dismiss
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. Tribunals
There are over 50 tribunals, each with its own jurisdiction.
Tribunals may have many different names such as commission,
committee , court. In some countries, like in United Kingdom,
tribunals are the lowest level in court system, but in some
countries, like Estonia, it is not part of court system.
Tribunals are subject to judicial review which examines reasons
for their decision and if made decision was in their power. Councils
on tribunals
check the openness, fairness, and impartiality, but have
no actual power other than advising government about the problem they
have found out about.
Judging panel (a group of people who judge in tribunals)
consists of 3 members. Lawyers do not like them, because they have a
little role to play in the
tribunal system as a lot of people can’t pay
for the lawyer services. For ordinary people tribunals are very
important, because it increases the
points of access to justice. Good
things about tribunals are that it’s not too formal, it is faster
and
cheaper , it also has necessary expertise. On downside, less
formal, faster, and cheaper option might result in
poor quality
service.
____________________________________________________________________
15. Arbitration
Arbitration is a private means of adjudication, arranged and
agreed between the parties who are having a dispute.
Parties in dispute place their dispute in the
hands of an
independent third party and gives him or the the power to decide on
the issue. Arbitrator is someone who has expert knowledge in the
field and arbitration
takes place in private.
Oral hearings are
rare ,
but if the dispute is fairly straightforward, the parties may agree
to waive of a formal hearing. In most of the cases arbitrator just
reviews written documents and makes an award.
Arbitration has many advantages. First of all, independent third
party is usually an expert knowledge in law and about the field the
disputes is in. Secondly, arbitration is not as
expensive , because
process is kept
simple and not as formal.
Finally , disputes solving
duration is short and can be arranged within days. On downside, less
formal, faster, and cheaper option might result in poor quality
service.
____________________________________________________________________
16. Work of lawyers: notary public and
prosecutor
For being a notary public or a prosecutor enjoy high level of
trust (having a lot of confidential knowledge) and there are controls
to regulate their competence (to ensure that someone is capable to do
his job) In some countries it is essential to get a
university degree
in law. In some countries, you have to pass professional examinations
(
exam what you take to have particular job) and if you have a degree
in a subject other than law, you have to take preparatory course (a
class done in order to be ready for sth).
In Estonia, you have to be Estonian citizen to be a notary. They
have to have a MA degree and have
passed candidate service (competing
to get a job, doing simpler job for example being an assistant for a
notary). Notaries deal with matrimonial (related to marriage)
property acts, testaments (a will), property transactions (someone
sells or buys objects that belong to him).
The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting
the case in a criminal trial (legal process) against an individual
accused of breaking the law. For being a prosecutor in Estonia you
have to have a MA degree in law.
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
17. Work of lawyers: judge and
attorney-at-law (sworn advocate)
Judges and attorneys-at-law enjoy a high level of trust because of
their specialized knowledge and there are examinations and other
controls to regulate their competence. In some countries, it is
essential for them to have a university degree in law, in other
countries they can have university degree in a subject other than
law, but then have to take preparatory course and there are also
professional examinations for them.
In Estonia attorneys-at-law are called sworn advocates (a lawyer
who defends someone in a law court). A person can be an
attorney-at-law when he has Master’s degree in law and has passed
the exam and he has to work at
least 3 years as an assistant of
attorney-at-law. They must be at least 24 years old. When a person
has committed a crime, he can’t be an attorney-at-law.
Judge presides over court proceedings (a set of actions which is
the official or accepted way of doing something). His power can be
shared with a jury. Judge hears all the witnesses (a person who sees
an event
happening , especially a crime or an accident) and evidence
(facts or signs that show that sth exists or is true) and makes a
judgment (an official legal decision).
In Estonia a judge must
speak good Estonian on level C1, have at
least Master’s degree at law and have high moral
character .
____________________________________________________________________
18. Legalese
Legalese is a way of
talking or writing with legal
terms in legal
professions, but mostly by lawyers. It has
specific features which
can make it difficult for the nonlawyer to understand.
Legalese is
quite difficult to understand. For example, legalese
uses a lot of lend
words , especially from
Latin , which are unknown
for non-lawyers. People also do not understand specialized words,
because they might have completely different meaning. Another
downside are the long complex sentences with very little punctuation.
Legalese is a way for lawyers to show their competence in legal
field which makes them more trustworthy. Using legalese helps to
prevent loopholes, because lawyer’s drafted documents might be
tried to be construed. Legalese helps to educate people and protects
their rights, because everyone must
sign a legal document at some
point of their life.
Legalese can be confusing to many, but it must be used to protect
the rights of people. People should be encouraged to use it to avoid
injustice in the future.
____________________________________________________________________
19. Provision of legal services
As legal services (a system that provides legal help for
people) are expensive, states sometimes provide access to legal
services for those who cannot afford it. For example, there are Law
Centres in England which are in
deprived areas (poor, small area).
Law centres deal with immigration (the act of someone coming to
live in a different country), consumer problems (problems with buying
goods or services),
employment (the fact of someone being paid to
work for a company or organization) and
housing .
There is also unmet need for legal services (people with legal
problems are not obtaining advice at all). Some people doesn’t
realize that their problem is a legal one, even if a person realizes
that his problem is legal, then he may not find a legal service
available or doesn’t approach it for some
reason .
In Estonia legal aid (help or support for finding answers for
legal questions) is available from law and advocate’s law offices
and the state. Also, notaries (an official who has the legal
authority to say that documents are correctly signed or true) and
bailiffs (an official who takes away someone's possessions when they
owe money) provide legal aid.
There is a Office of Legal Services which gives free legal help
for retired (someone who has stopped working) and
unemployed people.
Also, there is a homepage where a
paralegal (someone who
works in a
law company or a company's legal department and has some legal
training) answers to your questions
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
20. Separation of powers
Theory of separation of powers comes from the
French political
scientist and it
says : liberty does not
exist when the legislative
and executive powers are united in the same person or in the same
body of magistrates. There is also no liberty when judiciary power is
not separated from the legislative and executive power. Separation
into legislative, executive and judiciary branches is a
traditional way of separation of powers. Some countries, like Great Britain
find this system impractical and system of government does not
conform it. In United States the executive power belong to the
president , the legislature power to senate/house of representatives
and the judiciary power to Supreme court, but government does not
really conform to this system as each body
exercises control over
other through complex system.
In Estonia, the legislative power is carried out by Riigikogu,
executive by The Government of Estonia and judiciary by our
independent courts.
____________________________________________________________________
Kõik kommentaarid