Vajad kellegagi rääkida?
Küsi julgelt abi LasteAbi
Logi sisse

Tšernobõl, Chernobyl (0)

1 Hindamata
Punktid
The Chernobyl accident in 1986 was the result of a flawed reactor design that was operated with inadequately trained personnel. The resulting steam explosion and fires released at least 5% of the radioactive reactor core into the atmosphere and downwind. Two Chernobyl plant workers died on the night of the accident, and a further 28 people died within a few weeks as a result of acute radiation poisoning.
The April 1986 disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the Ukraine was the product of a flawed Soviet reactor design coupled with serious mistakes made by the plant operators.  It was a direct consequence of Cold War isolation and the resulting lack of any safety culture.
The accident destroyed the Chernobyl 4 reactor, killing 30 operators and firemen within three months and several further deaths later . Acute radiation syndrome was originally diagnosed in 237 people on-site and involved with the clean -up. Of these , 28 people died as a result of it within a few weeks of the accident. Nobody off-site suffered from acute radiation effects although a large proportion of childhood thyroid cancers diagnosed since the accident is likely to be due to intake of radioactive iodine fallout. Furthermore , large areas of Belarus , Ukraine, Russia and beyond were affected .
The Chernobyl site and plant
The Chernobyl Power Complex in Ukraine consisted of four nuclear reactors. Two reactors were under construction at the time of the accident. An artificial lake was constructed to provide cooling water for the reactors.
The 1986 Chernobyl accident
On 25 April the reactor crew at Chernobyl 4 began preparing for a test to determine how long turbines would spin and supply power to the main circulating pumps following a loss of main electrical power supply. This test had been carried out at Chernobyl the previous year, but the power from the turbine ran down too rapidly, so new voltage regulator designs were to be tested.
A series of operator actions, including the disabling of automatic shutdown mechanisms, preceded the attempted test early on 26 April. By the time that the operator moved to shut down the reactor, the reactor was in an extremely unstable condition .
The interaction of very hot fuel with the cooling water led to rapid steam production and an increase in pressure. The overpressure caused the cover plate of the reactor to become partially detached, rupturing the fuel channels and jamming all the control rods, which by that time were only halfway down. Intense steam generation then spread throughout the whole core causing a steam explosion and releasing fallout to the atmosphere. The second explosion threw out fragments from the fuel channels and hot graphite.
The graphite and fuel started a number of fires, causing the main release of radioactivity into the environment. From the second to tenth day after the accident, some 5000 tonnes of boron, dolomite, sand , clay and lead were dropped on to the burning core by helicopter in an effort to extinguish the blaze and limit the release of radioactive particles .

Immediate impact


Most of the released gases and fallouts were deposited close by as dust and debris, but the lighter material was carried by wind over the Ukraine, Belarus, Russia and to some extent over Scandinavia and Europe .
The casualties included firefighters who attended the fires. All these were put out in a few hours , but radiation doses on the first day were extremely high causing 28 deaths. Also the people involved in the clean-up received high doses of radiation.
Environmental and health effects
Studies in the Ukraine, Russia and Belarus say that over one million people possibly affected by radiation. By 2000, about 4000 cases of thyroid cancer had been diagnosed in exposed children . Ten years after the explosion, more and more children that survived the incident are developing cancer. Also the children who are born from parents exposed to high radiation levels may be in threat of deformities
Thyroid cancer is usually not fatal if diagnosed and treated early. Apart from the cancer, there is said to be no evidence of a major public health impact 14 years after the accident. There is little evidence of any increase in leukaemia, even among clean-up workers where it might be most expected. However many of those who survived the explosion might turn up with cancer some 20 years from the accident.

Progressive closure of the Chernobyl plant


In the early 1990s, some 400 million dollars was spent on improvements to the remaining reactors at Chernobyl to enchance their safety. Energy shortages necessitated the continued operation of one of them until December 2000. Unit 2 was shut down after a turbine hall fire in 1991, and unit 1 at the end of 1997.
Workers and their families now live in a new town, 30 km from the plant. This was built following the evacuation.
Ukraine depends upon Russia for energy supplies, particularly oil and gas, but also nuclear fuel. Although this dependence is gradually being reduced, continued operation of nuclear power stations is now even more important than in 1986.
When it was announced in 1995 that the two operating reactors at Chernobyl would be closed by 2000, a memorandum of understanding was signed by Ukraine and G7 nations to progress this, but its implementation was delayed. Alternative generating capacity was needed, either gas- fired or nuclear. Construction of these was halted in 1989 but then resumed, and both reactors came on line late in 2004.

Chernobyl today


Chernobyl unit 4 is now enclosed in a large concrete shelter which was built quickly to allow continuing operation of the other reactors. However, the structure is neither strong nor durable. Some 200 tonnes of highly radioactive material still remains deep within it.A new concrete and steel coffin is to be constructed around the radioactive reactor.
Tšernobõl-Chernobyl #1 Tšernobõl-Chernobyl #2 Tšernobõl-Chernobyl #3 Tšernobõl-Chernobyl #4
Punktid 10 punkti Autor soovib selle materjali allalaadimise eest saada 10 punkti.
Leheküljed ~ 4 lehte Lehekülgede arv dokumendis
Aeg2010-10-19 Kuupäev, millal dokument üles laeti
Allalaadimisi 9 laadimist Kokku alla laetud
Kommentaarid 0 arvamust Teiste kasutajate poolt lisatud kommentaarid
Autor aneteh Õppematerjali autor
Tutvustus, mis juhtus, põhjendus ja selgitus, tänapäev

Sarnased õppematerjalid

Cernobyl Disaster
32
pptx

Cernobyl Disaster

Chernobyl disaster Outline • What happened? • Elimination of the consequences • The Exclusion Zone • Conclusion • Quiz • Reference list What happened? • The Chernobyl disaster was a catastrophic nuclear accident that occurred on 26 April 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine (then officially the Ukrainian SSR). An explosion and fire released large quantities of radioactive particles into the atmosphere, which spread over much of the western USSR and Europe. • The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history in terms of cost and casualties, and is one of only two classified as a level 7 event (the maximum classification) on the International Nuclear Event Scale

Inglise keel
Tuuma energia
13
odt

Tuuma energia

In 1956, the first nuclear power station was built. Using uranium as its fuel. The station was named Calder Hall Power Station, built on coast of Cumberland. December 2, 1957, in Shippingport, Pennsylvania, the first full scale nuclear power plant goes into service. 1973, American utilities buy 41 nuclear power plants. January, 1983 President Reagan signs the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Hydro power was surpassed by nuclear power in total electrical generation in 1984. In the unit 4 reactor of the Chernobyl Nuclear plant were two explosions on April 26, 1986. This disaster exposed millions of people to radioactive isotopes. It has been linked many forms of cancer in natives of eastern Europe and Russia, as well as destroying animals and plants. December 1993, the total number of nuclear power plants in the United States is 109, collectively producing 610 billion kWhs of electricity. Nuclear power today Nuclear power is the world's largest source of emission-free energy

Füüsika
Nuclear Energy research paper
5
docx

Nuclear Energy research paper

NUCLEAR ENERGY · Can be produced in very small amount of volume and that makes it easy to transport ("Pros of nuclear," ) · Nuclear power plants have a big income, it helps to create more jobs and the countries to overcome the struggle with its bad economy Cons: · High construction costs because of radiation and complicated procedures and long construction time (Buzz, 2009) · Accident risks for example Chernobyl, Ukraine in 1986 or Fukushima, Japan in 2011 and radiation can cause serious health problems · Nuclear weapons may cause tension between different countries · Uranium is hard to get and expensive to mine, refine, and transport, and produce considerable environmental waste (including greenhouse gasses) during all of these procedures (Buzz, 2009) · Wastes lasts from 200 to 500 thousand years (Buzz, 2009)

Inglise keel
Energy - põhjalik referaat energiast
62
doc

Energy - põhjalik referaat energiast

SISUKORD ENERGY STORY................................................................................................................4 USES OF ENERGY............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Uses of energy in homes...............................................................................................5 2.2 Types of energy used in homes.................................................................................... 6 2.3 Energy use in different types of homes........................................................................ 6 2.4 Commercial Energy Use...............................................................................................9 2.5 Industrial and Manufacturing Energy Use..................................................................11 2.6 Transportation Energy Use.........................................................................................12 RENE

Inglise keele foneetika ja fonoloogia
The Cataclysmic Death of Stars
4
docx

The Cataclysmic Death of Stars

The Cataclysmic Death of Stars Republished from the pages of National Geographic magazine Written by Ron Cowen March 2007 Ever since he was a teenager, Stan Woosley has had a love for chemical elements and a fondness for blowing things up. Growing up in the late 1950s in Texas, "I did everything you could do with potassium nitrate, perchlorate, and permanganate, mixed with a lot of other things," he says. "If you mixed potassium nitrate with sulfur and charcoal, you got gunpowder. If you mixed it with sugar, you got a lot of smoke and a nice pink fire." He tested his explosive concoctions on a Fort Worth golf course: "I screwed the jar down tight and ran like hell." "kaboomWoosley", now an astronomer at the University of California at Santa Cruz, has graduated to bigger explosions--much bigger. Woosley studies some of the most powerful explosions since the birth of the universe: supernovae, the violent deaths of stars. The universe twinkles with these cataclysms. They happen every sec

Inglise keel
Energeetika arengu plaanimine
20
docx

Energeetika arengu plaanimine

ELEKTROENERGEETIKA INSTITUUT Referaat Taastvad Energiaallikad Esitamise tähtaeg 14.04.2009 Õppejõud: Hannes Agabus Tudeng: Sergei Belosapko Nikita Naumov Tallinn 2009 Contents: 1. Renewable energy 1.1. Costs................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. Potential future utilization..............................................................................4 1.3. Why Don't We Use More Renewable Energy? ...........................................5 2. Energy Types 2.1. Wind Energy.......................................................................................................6 2.1.1. Annual Generation........................................................................................7 2.1.2. Growth and cost trends.........................

Energeetika arengu plaanimine
Business peciliarities in Ukraine and Bealrus
106
pdf

Business peciliarities in Ukraine and Bealrus

TRADERUN MOODUL TRADERUN MODULE BUSINESS PECULIARITIES IN THE EU, RUSSIA AND EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES ÄRI ERIPÄRAD EUROOPA LIIDUS, VENEMAAL JA IDAPARTNERLUSRIIKIDES Lecturers: Ryhor Nizhnikau (responsible) Giorgi Gaganidze, Sergei Proskura, Andres Assor P2EC.00.202 (UT code), RIE 7044 (TLU code) Reading materials: Business peculiarities in Ukraine and Belarus Lugemismatejal: Äri eripärad Ukrainas ja Valgenenes Created by Andres Assor Tartu 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 1. UKRAINE ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. General information .......

Inglise keel
A letter and an essay
10
docx

A letter and an essay

Moreover, there are no students who have both breakfast and school lunch, eat more than four slices of brown bread per day, and avoid fat. The debate about the best way to generate electricity is back on the agenda. The most common methods are by burning coal, building dams, or using nuclear power. However, many people think that nuclear power is dangerous, and when you consider the experience of Chernobyl in the Ukraine over 20 years ago, you can see why. Countries such as France, however, get about 80% of their electricity from nuclear power plants, and the pro-nuclear scientists argue that it is actually much clearer than burning fossil fuels, which contributes to global warming. Others argue that it is better to get electricity from sustainable resources, such as the wind, the sea, and the sun. Although this

Inglise keel




Meedia

Kommentaarid (0)

Kommentaarid sellele materjalile puuduvad. Ole esimene ja kommenteeri



Sellel veebilehel kasutatakse küpsiseid. Kasutamist jätkates nõustute küpsiste ja veebilehe üldtingimustega Nõustun