Kodutöö akadeemiline inglise keel (0)

Taking up cycling instead of using a car is too dangerous in cities.
It could be argued that taking up cycling is very healthy for people. It supports people more to move and it is like doing a sport . Besides it is very good for environment. Thanks to using bicycles cities air will be cleaner and air is not such impure. Thanks to cleaner air people’s can breathe better air.
This is partly true, but taking up cycling instead of using a car is really more dangerous than use only cars. Thanks to taking up cycling traffic will go busier and messier. There is much different kind of movers in traffic and it makes traffic really dangerous.
It is clear that it is not too dangerous. There are many cities where cycling is very popular, for example in Copenhagen. If this method will be chosen, city needs to build special cycling roads. Thanks to these roads traffic should be safer.
More energy is used up taking items to recycling banks than the benefits gained from recycling materials.
It could be argued that there is more energy used up. There is made lot of campaigns , spend lot of money and so on. But quite big proportion of people does not care about it and think it is only wasting their time. Also they think that even they attend in this campaign, it change nothing.
This is partly true, but most of people have started already . Thanks to recycling banks homeless people will get better clothes, also food and everything what they need. Also environment is not polluting so much of any things.
It is clear that it has taken lot of resources. I must change people ways of thinking . They think it does not change anything and one person can change nothing. But if 10 000 stop this way of thinking and will start campaign, they can help many people.
All uses of recycled paper should be clearly labelled to encourage others to follow the example.

It could be argued that recycled pare should be labelled. People can see that giving and using recycled paper is popular and those who haven ’t started using yet will start later . People see that it is important to environment and also them. Thank to recycle paper they can save the money and natural resources are not so used and extend longer.
This is partly true, but nowadays rich people proportion goes bigger and they don’t use recycled paper. Rich people are too busy with their jobs and they don’t attention recycled paper. Also it takes more money to explain people what is recycled paper and government should report people about recycled paper campaign.
It is clear that all uses of recycled paper should be clearly labelled. I think people will attention more about recycled paper this kind of systems. They understand that it is necessary for human race and environment
Companies who discharge pollution into rivers , lakes and seas should be liable for cleaning up the environment.
It could be argued that there are lot of pollution. Pollution is caused by many different companies and factories. Usually the most contaminating factories are manufacturing companies. They should be liable for cleaning up the environment because they cause this pollution. Also they should be financial punished .
It is partly true, but it is comprehensible thanks to producing company’s pollution into rivers, lakes and seas. There are built many factories near water, like rivers. It does not mean that factories pollution more environments if it could build not near the water. Factories which are built near water pollution environment as much as they are not built near water.
It is clear that companies should be liable for cleaning up the environment. Thanks to these factories which are built near water water’s ecosystem become really contaminated. Governments should tax all companies who contaminate rivers, lakes or seas. The tax should be very big and also government put to use standards so as to rivers, lakes and seas will be cleaner.