Vajad kellegagi rääkida?
Küsi julgelt abi LasteAbi
Logi sisse

Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished (1)

5 VÄGA HEA
Punktid

Capital Punishment Should (not) Be Abolished
Capital punishment or the death penalty is the killing of the person as the punishment for offence . To get the capital punishment, you need to do a very serious crime , like homicide, or even more serious than that.
The pros of a capital punishment are that if the person gets that punishment, he or she will never get a chance to do something that cruel again . Sometimes the criminals , who get a prison sentence, do something illegal again, after that punishment. Second pro is that it’s cheaper for the country to kill the person, than to pay for his/her food and clothes for the rest of his/her life in the prison. Although the killing of the person also needs money , it’s still way cheaper than to pay for at least 40 years for all the life needs in prison.
The main con of the capital punishment is that if the person actually didn’t commit the crime, he or she was punished for, will die as innocent . Nobody can wake him or her up again, after that punishment. Second con is the question of humanity. A lot of countries think that killing the people is inhuman and therefore have abolished the capital punishment. Third con is that the person will just die, not get the actual punishment. Maybe lifetime prisonment would be better for such person, because then he/she will suffer more instead of just dying.
So in my opinion although the capital punishment has it’s pros and cons , it should be abolished, because the people, who get prisonment, will actually suffer more than they would for just dying.
Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished #1
Punktid 10 punkti Autor soovib selle materjali allalaadimise eest saada 10 punkti.
Leheküljed ~ 1 leht Lehekülgede arv dokumendis
Aeg2011-01-18 Kuupäev, millal dokument üles laeti
Allalaadimisi 24 laadimist Kokku alla laetud
Kommentaarid 1 arvamus Teiste kasutajate poolt lisatud kommentaarid
Autor s73n Õppematerjali autor
Pros and cons of capital punishment

Sarnased õppematerjalid

Capital punishments should not be abolished
1
doc

Capital punishments should not be abolished

Capital punishments should not be abolished There is a big argument in society ­ should capital punishment be abolished or not? Some people think that some criminals should just spend their whole life in prison and suffer there instead of capital punishment. I think that they deserve capital punishment. Why? If they spend their whole life in prison, it means, they will have three free meals in a day and they can also watch tv, study, work, don't have to pay taxes and some of the prisons look more nicer than someone's ordinary home and who pays for their free living? We do. I also think that some of the criminal are kind of mentally ill and they will never feel guilty of what they did and some are even proud of it if they have murdered or tortured somebody's daughter or

Inglise keel
Capital punishment - inglise keel
1
doc

Capital punishment - inglise keel

Capital punishment Capital punishment is the killing of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an great offence. It has been used in almost every part of the globe. There is an international organisation called Amnesty International who are fighting for human rights. Thanks for them there are many countries who abolished it. But is it right or should capital punishment exist? Firstly I belive capital punishment should exist because if you gonna take somebody's life it is only fair when you pay for this with your own life. Many people are thinking how cruel it is for a criminal but we should also think of the families that are broken apart because of the merciless acts of these criminals. Secondly it is too expensive to hold prisoners who have lifelong punishment. Especially it affects countries who are financially disadvantaged. It is not fair that taxpayers have to maintain the murders.

Inglise keel
Sissejuhatus inglise õiguskeelde
35
docx

Sissejuhatus inglise õiguskeelde

passive-vormi. Lõhikesi vorme ei kasutata! (don't) 150 sõna ­ Teema ­ "should mery-killing be punished?" HOMEWORK Terms to explain: Nation - a country, especially when thought of as a large group of people living in one area with their own government, language, traditions, etc: Stranger ­ someone whom you do not know Citizen - a person who is a member of a particular country and who has rights and obligations because of being born there or because of being given them Penalty - a punishment for doing something that is against a law Government - the group of people who officially control a country System of courts - a set of connected positions which operate together to ensure ... ? To commit a crime ­ to do sth that is forbidden by law Corruption - illegal, immoral or dishonest behaviour, especially by people in positions of power Fine (trahv) - an amount of money that has to be paid as a punishment for not obeying a rule or law

Inglise õiguskeel 1
For and against capital punishment
1
doc

For and against capital punishment

For and against capital punishment If one commits a murder or more, robbes a bank in addition or does something more terrible than human kind could possibly put up, then one is sentenced to death. But everyone can put up a legal murder of a convict. Do people agree with killing a killer, which is nothing more than a publik murder itself? Death penalty is justified if one causes pain for many people. Pain is a strong feeling, something you will never forget if experienced. Haunting nightmeres from the depths from

Inglise keel
For and against capital punishment
1
rtf

For and against capital punishment

For and against capital punishment Capital punishment as death penalty is the killing of a person by judical process for retribution and incapacitation. And it has advantages and disadvantages. The main advantage of capital punishment is that it permanently removes the worst criminals from society and should prove much safer for the rest of us. It is self- evident that dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes, either within prison or after escaping or being released from it. Another advantage of capital punishment is that country can have minor costs in prison. In other words, the country may very well better spend our (limited) resources on the old, the young and the sick etc., rather than on the long term imprisonment of murderers, rapists, etc.

Inglise keel
Capital Punishment Should be Abolished
1
doc

Capital Punishment Should be Abolished

Capital Punishment Should be Abolished Evidence suggests that the death penalty does not deter people from committing crimes. It is a cruel and cold blooded form of punishment and there have been instances where innocent people were sentenced to death and later found to be innocent. Why is it wrong? Capital punishment is a barbarous survival from a less enlightened and refined age; it is incongruous and incompatible with our present standard of civilization and humanity. It has been abolished by many states and countries, and we must look forward to the day when all the governments will follow this. It's a murder. The first question that comes to mind is, is it ethically acceptable to kill someone? When you execute a person, what is the difference between you and the criminal who has committed the crime of killing another individual. Furthermore, capital punishment can be inappropriate and unjust. It's not necessary.There is always a solution

Inglise keel
prelim year 1
32
docx

prelim year 1

TOPICS For the PRELIM Year 1 Put down 10-12 relevant terms and retell about: 1. Prescriptive and descriptive law Prescriptive law – prescribe how people ought to behave Descriptive law – describes the way people or natural phenomena behave Break the law – do something illegal Penalty – punishment Government – system by which a state or community is controlled Law – the system of rules System of courts – all judicial institutions Enforce – to make people obey the law Authority – a group of people with official responsibility for a particular area of activity /the moral or legal right or ability to control Prescribe – to tell someone what they must have or do, or to make a rule of something Impose

Kategoriseerimata
Law-makers breaking the law-torture as a justified interrogation technique
26
docx

Law-makers breaking the law: torture as a justified interrogation technique?

Law-makers breaking the law: torture as a justified interrogation technique? 1 Introduction It was Jeremy Bentham who thought of a famous method to give ethics a rational basis. He was fed up with the penal laws where offenders met corporate punishment and together with Cesario Beccaria he stood up to torture, corporal punishment, and the death penalty. He resisted against irrational moral emotions as the instigation for ethical conduct, saying only reasonable grounds could justify the moral decisions of individuals and legislators. And now his theory of is the one that is known for justifying torture (Verplaetse, 2008). Since 9/11 and the following fight against terrorism it became clear that the Bush administration thought of torture as something justifiable while it goes against all

Õiguse filosoofia




Kommentaarid (1)

ollikas profiilipilt
ollikas: suhteliselt hea kirjand oli abi. aitas
18:44 18-10-2011



Sellel veebilehel kasutatakse küpsiseid. Kasutamist jätkates nõustute küpsiste ja veebilehe üldtingimustega Nõustun