16. vabadusest ilma jätma deprive of freedom 17. üldkasulik töö community service 18. heidutama kuritegusid toime panemast, heidutus deter from committing crimes 19. leidma kuriteos süüdi olevat find guilty of a crime 20. tsiviilvastutust vältima avoid civil liability 21. tsiviilõigusrikkumine civil wrong 22. kahju kannatama suffer damage 23. hageja plaintiff, claimant 24. kostja defendant 25. kohtuväliselt lahendama settle out of court 26. tõendamiskohustus lasub the burden of proof lies on 27. vastutama tõenäosuse alusel be liable on the basis / balance of probability 28. kahjutasu määrama award damages 29. kahjutasu nõudma claim damages 30. kahju tekitama cause damage 31. õiguskaitsevahend legal remedies 32
10. süüd tõestama – tp prove the guilt 11. süüs kahtlema – to doubt the guilt 12. vabadusest ilma jätma – to deprive of freedom 13. lubatavad (vastuvõetavad) tõendid – admissible evidence 14. lubamatud tõendid – not admissible evidence 15. leidma kuriteos süüdi olevat – to find guilty of the crime 16. uute reeglite järgi – under the new rules 17. hageja – plaintiff/claimant 18. kostja - defendant 19. kohtuasja väljaspool kohut lahendama – to settle a case out of court 20. tõestamise kohustus lasub – burden of proof lies on 21. vastutav olema tõenäosuse alusel – to be liable on the balance of probability 22. võistlev menetlus – adversary procedure 23. võistlus kohtuniku ees – contest before a judge 24. vastaspooled – opposing parties 25
beyond reasonable doubt (väljaspool mõistlikku kahtlust) - the standard that must be met by the prosecution's evidence in a criminal prosecution: that no other logical explanation can be derived on the blanace of probabilities (tõenäosuse tasakaalul põhinev) - the standard of proof in civil cases, demanding that the case that is the more probable should succeed (51%) suspect (kahtlusalune) - a person believed to have committed a crime plaintiff (hageja) - someone who brings a lawsuit against someone into civil court defendant (kostja) - a person being sued or accused of a crime admissible as evidence (tõenduskõlblik) - evidence which is found useful in helping the trier of fact and lawfully obtained trespassing (eramaale sisse tungima) - the act of walking on private property offence (väärtegu) - wroungful act; act against law
5. Civil law Civil law – the part of the legal system that relates to personal matters, such as marriage and property, rather than crime Public law – the area of law that deals with the relationship between the government and other organizations or between the government and the public Private law – the area of law that deals with disagreements between people or companies Family law – an area of the law that deals with matrimonial matters and domestic relations Plaintiff – someone who makes a legal complaint against someone else in court On the balance of probabilities – a dispute is decided in favour of the party whose claims are more likely to be true Evidence – proof To prove – to show that something is true Procedure – a series of steps followed in a definite order Dispute – disagreement Citizen – a member of a state One way of classifying law is to divide it into public and private law.
recovery of debt hagi võla tagasinõudeks claim for damages kahjunõue arbitrary omavoliline arbitration arbitraas (erikohus (eestis pole need lubatud)) (not a judicial way of solving a case) (when 2 ppl have agreed, that sb is an expert, and you give that person the right to solve their problem.) resolve a dispute set up a court looma kohut a court is easily accessible (if it easy to get legal help from a court) sue for debt võla pärast kohtusse kaebama plaintiff advokaat tsiviilasjades (VIST???) mandatory = obligatory - kohustuslik the case is heard kohtuasi kuulatakse ära registrar - kohtusekretär, abikohtunik (eri maades eri asi!!) assistant judge abikohtunik law judge kaasistujad (pole erialast ettevalmistust) pretrial eelistung preliminary eel.. (nt preliminary consideration) in formal atmosphere rules of procedure party to.. millegi pool conciliation lepitamine adversarial võistlev
These regional franchises are known as master franchises, and are responsible for opening new restaurants, licensing new third party operators, and performing standards oversight of all restaurant locations in these countries. The largest example of a master franchise is Hungry Jack's, which exclusively owns, operates or sub-licenses over 300 restaurants in Australia. As with other multi-national corporations, Burger King has been involved in several legal disputes and cases, as both plaintiff and defendant, in the years since its founding in 1954. Situations involving a myriad of legal topics have affected all aspects of the company's operations. Depending upon its ownership and executive staff at the time, its responses to these challenges have ranged from a conciliatory dialog with its critics to a more aggressive opposition with questionable tactics and negative consequences. How the company responded
415. extra-judicial dispute settlement kohtuväline vaidluse lahendamine 416. arbitral tribunal vahekohus 417. Court of Justice of the EU Euroopa Liidu kohus 418. European Court of Human Rights Euroopa Inimõiguste kohus 419. misdemeanor procedure väärteomenetlus 420. Code of Civil Procedure tsiviilkohtumenetluse seadustik 421. adjudication of civil matter tsiviilasja lahendamine 422. proceeding of action hagimenetlus 423. plaintiff/defendant hageja/kostja 424. claim is settled nõuet rahuldama 425. claim is denied nõuet rahuldamata jätma 426. participate in person 427. be represented by a representative 428. contractual representative lepinguline esindaja 429. proceedings on petition hagita menetlus 430. adversarial procedure võistlev menetlus 431. expedited procedure in matters of payment order maksekäsu kiirmenetlus 432. apartement ownership korteromand 433
o collect evidence o they make a decision to go on with a case or not o gives evidences to prosecutor - a prosecutor needs to be sure if there are enough evidences - the investigation of crime and its prosecution are separate - the decision to prosecute - being heard in court Civil court - no jury - jurisdiction is limited by the type of the case - action takes place between two parties – plaintiff and defendant - on the balance of probabilities - provide remedy for wronged party - no criminal action Terms 33-34 1. discretion - (kaalutlusõigus) the freedom to decide what should be done in a particular situation (the right of discretion) 2. to administer an informal caution to sb - an oral warning given by a police officer and does not count towards a criminal record. 3
422. bench trial mitme kohtunikuga istung 423. misdemeanour väärtegu 424. statutory interpretation seadusega määratud tõlgendamine 425. district attorney ringkonnaprokurör 426. defendant süüdistatav 427. defence attorney kaitseadvokaat 428. persecution tagakiusamine 429. public defender riiklik kaitsja 430. self-defence enesekaitse 431. exculpatory õigeksmõistev 432. genocide genotsiid 433. tort õigusrikkumine 434. plaintiff hageja 435. gavel kohtuniku haamer *U11 436. public prosecutor riiklik süüdistaja 437. a council for the defence kaitseadvokaat 438. a collocation koosesinemine 439. to be on a bench olema kohtunik 440. to judge otsustama 441. the red tape bürokraat 442. a DP = a displaced person põgenik 443. homicide mõrv 444. statute põhikiri 445. invalid mittekehtiv 446. mandatory kohustuslik 447. a will testament 448. a parish kihelkond 449
In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, 8z G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 982-1026). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Carducci, B. J., Deuser, P. S., Bauer, A., Large, M., 8z Ramaekers, M. (1989). An application of the foot-in-the-door technique to organ donation. Journal of Business and Psychol- ogy, 4, 245-249. _ REFERENCES Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., Il{ Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Be- havior and Personality,s, 547-562. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387-1397. Chaiken, S. (1986). Physical appearance and social influence. In C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna, Il{ E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 3, pp. 143-177)
annaabi.ee 
