Vajad kellegagi rääkida?
Küsi julgelt abi LasteAbi
Logi sisse

Brexit (inglise keelne) (0)

1 Hindamata
Punktid
Inglise keel - Kõik luuletused, mis on inglise keeles




From 28 to 27. What is the long-term consequence of the UK leaving the European Union? There is no question that the United Kingdom leaving the European Union or Brexit as we all 
know it, is a big hit for the EU and the UK. It’s by no means an easy process and a lot of people 
are against it, but today nothing can be done to stop it. Even though Brexit is seen by its leaders
as a positive change, it will also have quite a negative effect on Britain and play a big role in 
reshaping European Union. Most British people were voting for Brexit to regain sovereignty, to ‘take back control’ and 
regulate their laws. At first glance, it may seem that they would be in charge of their actions 
which would mean that nobody on the outside can manipulate them. Although nowadays 
countries depend on each other a lot and the UK is no exception. Everything is more connected 
than ever and because of that existing completely on your own is quite an impossible task. For 
that matter, giving up a little bit of sovereignty can be beneficial. For example, trading in the EU. 
It is not always regulated by countries and some may not like it, but it can also lead to new 
routes, destinations which in the end can bring bigger profits. Also, being on your own and 
arranging new trade regulations requires a lot of resources that could be spent elsewhere. One of the ideas introduced in the Brexit campaign was that they wouldn’t have to pay the EU 
membership fees. As a matter of fact, in 2018 the UK had to pay the EU £20 billion before the 
abatement (the reduction of some nuisances) was applied, which was then about £4.5 billion. 
Because of the European Union regulations, about £4.5 billion more was shared between the 
UK's public and private sectors. That left them with £11 billion in membership payments. So that
means, there would be about £11 billion more to spend on the UK's own needs. As Johnson 
promised, about £350 million a week which sums up to £18 million a year would go to the 
National Health Service. According to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, if
the UK opted not to leave, its economy would’ve grown annually by £70 billion in the long term, 
which is a lot more than what Mr. Prime Minister admitted to allocating for the NHS. Judging by 
these numbers, the loss will be big and it’s going to have a significant effect on them. As for the EU, it will lose a country that played a big part in Europe’s economy and annual GDP 
will fall by about 5%. EU nations’ exports will take a big hit, as some countries depend a lot on 
exports to the UK. For example, Ireland’s exports will be majorly affected, since about 14% are 
sent directly to Britain. They would have to come up with new deals that could diminish Ireland’s
export profits. Also, a lot of people living and working in the UK are sending money home to 
other EU countries. As the numbers show, about €7.5 billion is being sent home from Britain. In 
the case of no-deal Brexit, new laws and requirements could be triggered that would have a 
negative side effect on those who are already working there or were planning on starting.  Brexit is considered somewhat of a wake-up call for everybody. It is not a time to lose hope and 
declare the end of the union. On the contrary, it is time to regroup and rethink the current 
situation. It has also started some new political movements. For example, Italy’s population was 
one of the least supportive of the European Union before the 2016 British referendum. Since 
then the percentage of non-supportive citizens has dropped about 22%. It is now a home for a 


new pan-European (involves most of the nations of Europe) political party called Volt Europa. It 
has parties all across Europe and is gaining more support each day. It was founded by Andre 
Venson, because of Brexit and he felt the fear that the European values are in danger. Their 
main idea is to reshape the EU as we know it and steer it in the right direction and create 
something European that would unite all the nations. Brexit will have a significant effect on Great Britain and the European Union. Judging by the 
numbers, it will have a significant negative effect on the UK. That goes for the EU also, where 
people working and living in Great Britain could lose their income and will have to find a new 
place to live. On the other hand, it has triggered some changes in the EU that in the end could 
benefit greatly. Everything negative comes with something positive attached to it and only the 
future will tell how we’ll cope with it.
Brexit-inglise keelne #1 Brexit-inglise keelne #2
Punktid 50 punkti Autor soovib selle materjali allalaadimise eest saada 50 punkti.
Leheküljed ~ 2 lehte Lehekülgede arv dokumendis
Aeg2020-12-10 Kuupäev, millal dokument üles laeti
Allalaadimisi 5 laadimist Kokku alla laetud
Kommentaarid 0 arvamust Teiste kasutajate poolt lisatud kommentaarid
Autor Arabellabella Õppematerjali autor
There is no question that the United Kingdom leaving the European Union or Brexit as we all know it, is a big hit for the EU and the UK. It’s by no means an easy process and a lot of people are against it, but today nothing can be done to stop it. Even though Brexit is seen by its leaders as a positive change, it will also have quite a negative effect on Britain and play a big role in reshaping European Union.

Sarnased õppematerjalid

The euro in Estonia
5
doc

The euro in Estonia

Kati-Liis Karu 03.01.2011 The euro in Estonia Joining the European Union in 2004 made people in Estonia think about the changing of currency. We had almost six years to get used to the fact that the Estonian kroon is eventually going to end. In that time there was a lot of discussion about whether we should stick to the kroon or change our money to the euro. Lots of people were afraid that they lose their money during the period of transition - this belief was quite popular among people who still remember the time when the Russian rubles were changed into kroons and did lose much money. Luckily there haven't been any complaints yet. The reason I chose this political concern is its contradictoriness. I myself dislike the fact that the kroon is "leaving us" but I hope that in the long run it will seriously benefit us. According to Conjuncture Institute's research 39% of respondents don't care about this issue. 34% of responses w

Äriinglise keel
Policy of 2016
4
docx

Policy of 2016

Policy of 2016 Brexit, which means „British“ and „exit“ is referendum to the United Kingdom for leaving from the European Union. Referendum was held on 23rd June 2016. About 52% of the British people voted for leaving the EU. Brexit turned things in the EU upside down and people were amazed, especially people who voted for not leaving the EU. After voting and seeing the results, a lot of people who voted for leaving regretted it, because they just wanted to see if UK is capable to do something big like this. That is why UK is extending the Brexit, because most of the people do not want it. I think when Brexit is finally accomplished, then we will see what will happen and what will be changed in British people

Inglise keel
Business peciliarities in Ukraine and Bealrus
106
pdf

Business peciliarities in Ukraine and Bealrus

TRADERUN MOODUL TRADERUN MODULE BUSINESS PECULIARITIES IN THE EU, RUSSIA AND EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES ÄRI ERIPÄRAD EUROOPA LIIDUS, VENEMAAL JA IDAPARTNERLUSRIIKIDES Lecturers: Ryhor Nizhnikau (responsible) Giorgi Gaganidze, Sergei Proskura, Andres Assor P2EC.00.202 (UT code), RIE 7044 (TLU code) Reading materials: Business peculiarities in Ukraine and Belarus Lugemismatejal: Äri eripärad Ukrainas ja Valgenenes Created by Andres Assor Tartu 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 1. UKRAINE ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. General information .......

Inglise keel
European Union economic
1
odt

European Union economic

European Union economic 9th May 1951, six Western-Europe countries (Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, France and Germany) signed a treaty to run their heavy industries ­ coal and steel ­ under a common management. From this economic cooperation agreement, European Union has grown up. For today, the aim of this union has made 180º turn but the reason why more and more countries are joining it is still same ­ to rise the economy. So how does it work? European Union is functioning like an independent country. It collects taxes to reach its objectives. Taxes are collected mainly from member countries GDP (1,1% of countries budget) but as well the import duties on good bought into EU. Also, every member country is paying 0,1%-0,33% of their VAT (value added tax). It is the way how EU gets its budget which is about 120 billion per year. This money is spent mainly to improve agriculture (direct aid, export refunds, storage, rural development and other) but also to

Majandus
European Union
8
docx

European Union

European Union Research Compose: x X School 2009/10 What is European Union? The European Union (EU) is an economic and political partnership between 27 democratic European countries. EU population is almost a half milliard European union stands for caring and fair community. All EU members are devoted to peace, democracy, human rights respecting and working together to spread these values all the world. History The beginning of EU might consider the year 1951, when European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was constitute. Six countries joined with it for peace: Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Italy, France and Germany. With that move, coal and steel industry were put under one organisation, so war was almost impossible between these six country. Cooperation in different areas improved, when in 25. March 1957 Treaties of Rom , European Economic Community and European Atomic Energy Community memorandum of association were signed. These were sundry

Inglise keel
Kliima kohta USAs
2
doc

Kliima kohta USAs

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010611-2.html *I also call on Congress to work with my administration to achieve the significant emission reductions made possible by implementing the clean energy technologies proposed in our energy plan. Our working group study has made it clear that we need to know a lot more. *The United States has spent $18 billion on climate research since 1990 -- three times as much as any other country, and more than Japan and all 15 nations of the EU combined. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2004/feb/22/usnews.theobserver *Jeremy Symons, a former whistleblower at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said that suppression of the report for four months was a further example of the White House trying to bury the threat of climate change. *Senior climatologists, however, believe that their verdicts could prove the catalyst in forcing Bush to accept climate change as a real and happening phenomenon. They also hope it will convince the

Inglise keel
English as a Global Language
60
pdf

English as a Global Language

Tallinna Mustamäe Humanitargümnaasium Valeria Jefremenkova ENGLISH AS A GLOBAL LANGUAGE INGLISE KEEL KUI ÜLEMAAILMNE KEEL Research work Supervisor: Jevgenija Kozlova Tallinn 2016 1 Table of Contents СONTENT…………………………………………………………………………………...2 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………...3 CHAPTER I……………………………………………………………………………….....5 1.1. A Brief History of the English Language…………………………………………...…..5 1.2. Origins of English as the Global Language……………………………………..……....6 1.3. Necessity of a Global Language...……………………………………………………....8 1.4. Critici

Inglise keel
THE CAPITALIST NIGER
104
pdf

THE CAPITALIST NIGER

THE CAPITALIST NIGER Chika Onyeani ………………………Every African must internalise this book - period….DAA INTRODUCTION In October 1960, Nigeria received its independence from Britain. By then, Ghana the former Gold Coast had been independent for three years under the great Osagyefo Kwame Nkumah. It was a time for celebrating Africa’s coming of age, as more and more African countries received their independence either from Britain or France. It was especially a poignant time for Africa, as then British Prime Minister Harold McMillan articulated his now famous “winds of change” sweeping Africa. We had high hopes for Africa, for the Black race, that the insidious imposition of foreign rule on us, the looting of Africa’s natural resources by our colonial masters accorded us would be things of history. That is more than forty years ago. Unfortunately, the promise of independence has not been fulfilled. Today, Africa has become more desolate; there is more starvation

Inglise keel




Meedia

Kommentaarid (0)

Kommentaarid sellele materjalile puuduvad. Ole esimene ja kommenteeri



Sellel veebilehel kasutatakse küpsiseid. Kasutamist jätkates nõustute küpsiste ja veebilehe üldtingimustega Nõustun