4) moksa (moksa not so much) material religiosity that gives material results. B. Focus of Upanisads is Jnana kanda need of philosophy. Understanding my spiritual nature everything talked in karma kanda is neglected since it all it temporary. Focus is on detachment. C. Focus of Srimad Bhagavatam is - bhakti. Spiritual things are not just opposite of material things, but they also have variety, beauty own wonderful reality. God is as living, loving person. There is a reciprocation between soul & Allatractive Supreme Lord and entering into this reciprocation is the ultimate goal of life. Ultimately the lead to Krishna through this progression.
They understand that beyond this world there is some kind of eternal existance and they conisder this a highest reality. Yogis realize His sat-cit eternity and knowledge aspect Paramatma realization. They understand that Supersoul is everywhere & Supersoul is conscious of me, my activities and I want to be conscious of Supersoul. At that stage one doesn't consider the Supersoul as the object of devotion but as the object of meditation. There is no reciprocation of love through service and pastimes. Bhaktas perceive His sat-ci-ananda aspects and have complete realization of Absolute Truth. Level of realization Aspect of Absolute Truth that is Seeker realized BRAHMAN SAT Jnani PARAMATMA SAT-CIT Yogi BHAGAVAN SAT-CIT-ANANDA Bhakta
Credits appear on page 260, which constitutes an extension of the copyright page. Contents Preface ix Introduction xi CHAPTER 1 Weapons of Influence 1 Click, Whirr 2 Betting the Shortcut Odds 6 The Profiteers 10 Jujitsu 12 Summary 16 Study Questions 16 CHAPTER 2 Reciprocation: The Old Give and Take ... and Take 18 How the Rule Works 22 The Rule Is Overpowering 23 Politics 26 The Not-So-Free Sample 28 The Rule Enforces Uninvited Debts 31 The Rule Can Trigger Unequal Exchanges 33 Reciprocal Concessions 35 Rejection-Then-Retreat 37 Reciprocal Concessions, Perceptual Contrast, and the Watergate Mystery 40
Calculus y Tall and short reveal each other y High and low support each other y Sound and tone harmonize each other y Front and back follow each other y Therefore the sages: y The sages, by understanding the existence of the world of opposites, are able to transcend the world of duality by doing the following: 2.2) On Duality y Manage the work of detached actions y Conduct actions without any intentions, expectations, or reciprocation y Mother Theresa helping the poor y Conduct the teachings of no words y Instead of judging and criticizing others over what is good or bad, one teaches by example y Saints and Sages do not judge or criticize us. They instead teach us through their actions and encourage us regardless if we're good or bad y They work with myriad things but do not control; They create but do not possess;
nt kui abistajaid on läheduses palju, on väiksem tõenäosus, et inimene abistab. A. Batson. 4 põhimotiivi 4 põhimotiivi: Egoism (self-benefit): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of the actor e.g., gaining rewards, avoiding punishment Altruism (benefiting other individual): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of other people no implication for reciprocation Collectivism (benefiting a group): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of a social group e.g., family, ethnic group, community (may lead harm to an outgroup) Principalism (upholding a moral principle): Prosocial acts follow from a moral principle e.g., "greatest good for the greatest number" linked with moral reasoning (Underwood & Moore, 1982) Sotsiaalne mõju
· Empaatia kui prosotsiaalsuse eeldus. Abistamise motiivid · Normi järgimine · Positiivne enesehinnang · Emotsionaalne erutus · Tunnustuse otsimine · Kasu · Ühtekuuluvus A. Batson (1994) 4 põhimotiivi: Egoism (self-benefit): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of the actor e.g., gaining rewards, avoiding punishment Altruism (benefiting other individual): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of other people no implication for reciprocation Collectivism (benefiting a group): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of a social group e.g., family, ethnic group, community (may lead harm to an outgroup) Principalism (upholding a moral principle): Prosocial acts follow from a moral principle e.g., "greatest good for the greatest number" linked with moral reasoning (Underwood & Moore, 1982) Prosotsiaalsuse kujundamine · Keda millal abistatakse. Vastutuse hajumine suures rühmas
abistatakse neid, kes on mingil moel mulle sarnased. Abistatakse ka lähtuvalt sugulussuhtest A. Batson (1994) 4 põhimotiivi: Egoism (self-benefit): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of the actor e.g., gaining rewards, avoiding punishment Altruism (benefiting other individual): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of other people no implication for reciprocation Collectivism (benefiting a group): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of a social group e.g., family, ethnic group, community (may lead harm to an outgroup) Principalism (upholding a moral principle): Prosocial acts follow from a moral principle e.g., "greatest good for the greatest number" linked with moral
• Emotsionaalne erutus • Tunnustuse otsimine • Kasu • Ühtekuuluvus A. Batson (1994) – 4 põhimotiivi: Egoism (self-benefit): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of the actor – e.g., gaining rewards, avoiding punishment Altruism (benefiting other individual): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of other people – no implication for reciprocation Collectivism (benefiting a group): Prosocial acts contribute to the welfare of a social group – e.g., family, ethnic group, community (may lead harm to an outgroup) Principalism (upholding a moral principle): Prosocial acts follow from a moral principle – e.g., “greatest good for the greatest number” – linked
annaabi.ee 
