dwells than they believe in poetic diction” (1983, 83). For him a process takes place that characterizes this means: “the prosaic phrases guarantee the dwells elevated and ‘poetic’ elements, rooting them in commonplace reality” (1992, 89) 103. And Whalen, talking about to Larkin and Lawrence, affirms that “poets of epiphany and beholding empirical observation, both participate in the twentieth-century inclination toward to poetry of concreteness and attentiveness to the details of the world” (1986, 93). Everett sees in Larkin a certain insolent or thug vein originated, partly, by certain practice of “shocking the bourgeois, but in special reversed form: needling the aesthetic to the reader” (1989, 129). In the case of Larkin, the translator will avoid that tendency so in rows inclined to “poetize” the poetry translations, regarding who their author could be, and will
vice in general. This was opinion of Addison and Steele. In practice, largely ignored. Satire was based on the events and personalities of the moment. Parody was central to its working. Contrasting ideas, values, principles, attitudes, style, identities. Vehicles: mock-panegyric (kiidukõne), mock-heroic, the burlesque and travesty as well as simple imitation. Generally free use of conversational language, humour, vividness, concreteness of description, topical subjects, general intention of improving society by exposing its vices and follies. Jonathan Swift: combined parody, with its imitation of form and style and satire in prose; technique to create fictional speaker (Gulliver), utter sentiments which intelligent reader recognises as self-satisfied, egoistical, stupid. Master of understaded irony. Gulliver’s Travels (greatest of satires). Fashionable guise of
have been made and also a teleological approach used. Upon analysing the issues according to the abovementioned methods certain conclusions have been drawn: a) An act of an official, which he/she commits in the interests of a person giving a bribe due to his/her official position, can only be an unlawful act. Such an act fulfils the elements of another crime and upon solving the case the aggregate of those matters must be taken into account. Considering the requirement of the concreteness of an act prior agreement by and between the person giving a bribe and the person accepting a bribe is necessary. b) The terms “official,” “officer,” “civil servant” and “non-staff employee” and the term “official position,” which is related to all of those (also, at the moment, not related) need to be systemised and specified in the Estonian judicial area as soon as possible. c) For the purpose of general prevention and also minimising the number of crimes related
vice versa). Väideldakse formaalselt korrektselt, ent emotsionaalselt ebaadekvaatselt, mis tekitab teises pooles usaldamatust ning vaenulikku suhtumist. 7. Metafüüsilised vead (metaphysical fallacies) on pigem filosoofilised kui loogilised, ent needki võivad mõjutada argumentatsiooni korrektsust. Need on pigem vead mõtlemislaadis, mitte konkreetsed argumenteerimisvead. a) Konkreetse ja abstraktse sassiminek (the fallacy of misplaced concreteness või confusing the abstract with the concrete). Viga tekib siis, kui abstraktse terminiga väljendatut püütakse väljendada sellega lähedase konkreetse termini abil või vastupidi. b) Olemusliku ja juhusliku sassiminek (the fallacy of accident või confusing the accidental with the essential). Viga tekib siis, kui põhitunnuseks peetakse juhutunnust ja vastupidi. Tihti on tegemist ka non sequitur-tüüpi veaga.
annaabi.ee 
