in boreal forest landscapes.- Boreal Environment Research, 18(A), 13-24. Seidl, R., Schelhaas, M.J., Lexer, M.J. 2011. Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbanceregimes in Europe.- Global Change Biology, 17, 2842-2852. Stadelman, G., Bugmann, H., Wermelinger, B., Bigler, C. 2014. Spatial interactions between storm damage and subsequent infestations by the European spruce bark beetle. – Forest Ecology and Management, 314, 167-174. Swift, K., Ran, S. 2012. Successional Responses to Natural Disturbance, Forest Management, and Climate Change in British Columbia’s Forests.- BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 13(1), 1-23. Thomas, P.A., McAlpine, R.S. 2010. Fire in the Forest. UK: Cambridge University Press. 225 lk. Woods, A., Coates, K.D. 2013. Are biotic disturbance agents challenging basic tenets of growth and yield and sustainable forest management?- Forestry, 0, 1-12.
Succession that begins in areas where no soil is initially present is called primary succession, whereas succession that begins in areas where soil is already present is called secondary succession. The trajectory of ecological change can be influenced by site conditions, by the interactions of the species present, and by more stochastic factors such as availability of colonists or seeds, or weatherconditions at the time of disturbance. Some of these factors contribute to predictability of successional dynamics; others add more probabilistic elements. In general, communities in early succession will be dominated by fast- growing, well-dispersed species (opportunist, fugitive, or r-selected life-histories). As succession proceeds, these species will tend to be replaced by more competitive (k-selected) species. 39. Miks suktsessioon peatub? According to classical ecological theory, succession stops when the sere has arrived at an
TREE 12: 266-269. 51. Tamm, L. 1967. Süstaga Halliste jõel. Eesti Loodus 6: 383-386. 52. Taylor, D. R., Aarssen, L. W. & Loehle, C. 1990. The species-pool hypothesis and plant community diversity. Oikos 68: 371-374. 53. Talvi, T., 2001. Pool-looduslikud kooslused. Ökoloogiliste Tehnoloogiate keskus. 54. Tilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 55. Touzard B., Clément B., Lavorel S. 2002. Successional patterns in an eutrophic alluvial wetland of western France. Wetlands 22 (1): 111-125. 56. Truus L., Tõnisson, A. 1998. The ecology of floodplain grasslands in Estonia. In: Joyce CB, Wade PM (eds) European Wet Grasslands: Biodiversity, Management and Restoration. Wiley, Chichester, 49-60. 57. van der Maarel, E. 1998. Species diversity in plant communities in relation to structure and dynamics. In: During H. J., Werger, M.J.A. & Willems, J. H. (eds.). Diversity and
annaabi.ee 
