imagery as a semiotic process occurring in an interactive social environment that leads to pictorial behaviors that may engage single or multiple modalities of expression. This framework acknowledges psychobiological factors that found development of pictorial activity while emphasizing the role of culture in validating or deselecting specific pictorial systems. It constitutes an attempt to decolonize discourse about artistic development by pointing to the usefulness and value of pictorial repertoires that have remained outside of the acclaim of the Western art world and yet play a significant role in children's lives (Kindler, 1999). In addition to highlighting the dimension of pictorial choices and their relationship to specific purposes of pictorial behavior, the model proposed by Darras and Kindler recognizes frequent interplay of the gestural , vocal -verbal, and graphic actions in the emergence and development of pictorial systems. This is consistent with Parson's
credibility of the show is being evaluated. In the survey it was found out the, who's acting in the show, is becoming decisive in the choice of the show. The reputation of the performance is important. On the important place on the position of the public are the theme of the staging, play's author and director. In the summary of the analysis of the directors interviews it turned out that in repertoire of the theatre every specific theatre's aim, target group and ohter theatre's repertoires has to be considered. Important is artistic leader's and marketing department's opinion. The director solely does not decide the repertoire of the theatre. The audience and popularity of the show is not 100% predictable. KASUTATUD ALLIKAD RAAMATUD Bell, E., Bryman, A. (2003). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Epner, Luule, Monika Läänesaar, Anneli Saro. (2006). Eesti teatrilugu. Teatrikunst. Tallinn: Ilo. Hartnoll, Phyllis. (1989). Lühike teatriajalugu
his repertoire the following procedure: to utter x if, for some audience A, S intends A to believe that S believes that P. (That last clause is a simplified version of "S speaker-means that P"; Grice argues that the simplification is harmless here.) Now he expands this analysis to cover utterance meaning for a group of speakers: x [unstructured] means that P for group G if and only if (a) many members of G have in their repertoires the procedure of uttering x if, for some A, they want A to believe that they believe that P; and (b) the retention of that procedure is for them conditional on the assumption that at least some other members of G have that same procedure in their repertoires. I think what is supposed to overcome obstacle 1 is the combination of (a) and (b); that the relevant procedure is widespread in the community and that individual members of the community rely on the other members to
annaabi.ee 
