Godwin, Earl of Wessex. In 1045, he married Godwin's only daughter, Edith. Godwin was the most important nobleman in England. They had no children as Edward had taken a vow of celibacy. Even this marriage couldn't prevent a breach between Godwin and Edward in 1049. A number on Normans were killed in a scrap in Dover and Kent in 1051. Edward still had influential friends in Normandy and he wanted the people of Dover punhised for this. Edward asked Earl Godwin to be the punisher. After saying no to king he raised an army against Edward instead. The other two senior noblemen, the earls of Mercia and Northumbria, remained loyal to Edward. Later Edward outlawed Godwin and his family in Flanders. Between 1051 and 1052, Edward increased the number of Normans who advised him at court. Edward's continued favouritism caused problems with his nobles. In 1052 Godwin and his sons returned to England with an army. The army was commanded by his two sons Harold and Tostig.
The punishment thus focuses on the future. In this, 4 Bentham diversifies between general and individual prevention. General prevention is sought by announcing the punishment and by implementing it. In other words, as mentioned before, the implementation of the punishment always has to serve as a purpose. The punishment therefore has a deterring effect. This will demonstrate the power of the punisher. The power position needn't only be confirmed towards the subject but also to the potential subjects as well. It applies to the entire population. Considering that the utilitarian purpose of punishment is to avoid future crimes, it means that it is not done out of hate towards the person itself. When looking at media imagery from prisons as Guantanamo Bay for example, it can be seen that the purpose of torture there is not simply to avoid future crimes, which takes away all justification,
annaabi.ee 
