[11] 10 , « 21,» , [ ]. Available: http://chem21.info/page/235090002040246182165252088074131240225123200074/. [ : 19 05 2016]. [12] , « : - ,» , [ ]. Available: http://www.olimp- 52 food.com/stati/kak_proverit_kachestvo_proteina:_ekspress-test_na_podlinnost. [ : 29 04 2016]. [13] Ivan, « ,» Expertoza, [ ]. Available: http://expertoza.com/2014/06/proverka-proteina/. [ : 27 04 2016]. [14] Pikabu, « ?,» [ ]. Available: http://pikabu.ru/story/kak_proverit_protein_na_podlinnost__1855566. [ : 20 04 2016]. 54 1 1. 1 2. 56 3. 2 ; 20% ; 50% ; 30% 1. , . , , 50% . 58 ; 30%
In fact, the myofibrillar lattice alone could not be reduction in the diameter of muscle cells has responsible for the movement of fluid to the been observed in postmortem muscle (Offer extracellular space and ultimately out of the and Cousins 1992). This water that is expelled muscle. The myofibrils are linked to each from the myofibril and ultimately the muscle other and to the cell membrane via proteina- cell eventually collects in the extracellular cious connections (Wang and Ramirez- space. Several studies have shown that gaps Mitchell 1983). These connections, if they develop between muscle cells and between are maintained intact in postmortem muscle, muscle bundles during the postrigor period would transfer the reduction in diameter of (Offer et al. 1989; Offer and Cousins 1992).
annaabi.ee 
