meeting with the Prime Minister. By tradition, the latter informs the Sovereign, who is head of state, about important affairs of state and government business, and asks the sovereign for his or her opinion. With over 60 years of experience, the current Queen Elizabeth II has acquired great experience in managing affairs of state, and an unparalleled experience of international relations, and now acts as an experienced adviser, well liked by her Prime Ministers, of all political persuasions . The House of Lords This is the "Upper House" of the British Parliament . It consists of about 750 members (a variable number ) most of whom are Life Peers (i.e. not hereditary lords), or people who have been ennobled for services rendered to the nation. These Life Peers are mostly former members of the House of Commons, or former senior officials, judges, or former business leaders or trade union leaders: each government and opposition party has the right, each year,
then analyse, if the author has her own certain stereotypes in her two writings. For this I chose two of my personal favourites from her creation: “Pride and prejudice” and “Persuasion”. In the first chapter I wrote about Austen’s life and development of her creation, in the second I compared writer’s books’ society’s backround to the real life 19th century’s England, the third and the fourth chapter is about “Pride and prejudices” and “Persuasions” themes and characterizations. In the fifth chapter I brought similar parallels between the characters and in the sixth part I prepared final analysis based on similar character-pairs. It emerged, that the two author novels have common motives, for example the main character pairs are each other’s contrast, balancing one another with it and creating a perfect harmony, which was Jane Austen’s idea of perfect marriage. There were many similar characters to compare
Darcy to marry your daughter; but would my giving you the wished-for promise make their marriage at all more probable? Supposing him to be attached to me, would my refusing to accept his hand make him wish to bestow it on his cousin? Allow me to say, Lady Catherine, that the arguments with which you have supported this extraordinary application have been as frivolous as the application was ill- judged. You have widely mistaken my character, if you think I can be worked on by such persuasions as these. How far your nephew might approve of your interference in his affairs, I cannot tell; but you have certainly no right to concern yourself in mine. I must beg, therefore, to be importuned no farther on the subject." "Not so hasty, if you please. I have by no means done. To all the objections I have already urged, I have still another to add. I am no stranger to the particulars of your youngest sister's infamous elopement. I know it all; that the young man's marrying her was
annaabi.ee 
