WHAT IT TAKE FOR MARGARET THATCHER TO BECOME THE PRIME MINISTER It is a rather big achievement for a woman to become the prime minister. Back these days it was even inadmissible to believe in it. She was the only woman in the Parlament at that time. Her father was a pole model and inspiration for her ever since she was a young girl. When she saw her father giving powerful and confident speeches, it motivated her to become as looked up as her father was as a political figure. What gave her a push into politics was wish to make a change in the world, Not to become someone, but to change something that would matter. She was wise and clever enough to do so.
thousands to hundreds of thousands of individuals. It was found out that in all the broiler farms there were dead and crippled birds. It can be said that most of these problems exict because there is not enough space for birds. They are kept in huge factory sheds, each containing 15,000-25,000 animals. It also means that individual care is impossible which also leads to the fact that those animals suffer day after day for all their life. In almost every pig farm there were many inadmissible problems. For example, pigs were kept in filthy confined pens, they had scars and injuries. Usually they were bodily harmed because of the lack of space. In every third visited piggery there were dead pigs. Furthermore, carcasses were left among the other pigs. In all the visited chicken farms their habitants were stressed and often had signs of pecking. In many of these farms there were dead hens and the corpses were decayed. It is obvious that
16. kohtusse kutsuma summon 17. kohtukutse summons, subpoena 18. küsitlus kohtus examination 19. ristküsitlus kohtus cross-examination 20. asitõendid real evidence, physical evidence 21. kaudsed tõendid circumstantial evidence, indirect evidence 22. lubatavad tõendid admissible evidence 23. lubamatud tõendid inadmissible evidence 24. võistlev menetlus adversary / adversarial procedure 25. uuriv menetlus inquisitorial/inquisitional procedure 26. kahjustavaid tõendeid ümber lükkama rebut damaging evidence 27. kohtuvaidlused litigation 28. kohtukulud court costs, costs of an action 29. riigi/tasuta õigusabi legal aid 30. therefore seetõttu, sellepärast 31
Explain in English: 1. civil procedure – a procedure against the alleged lawbreaker by the wronged party 2. court proceedings - trial 3. claimant – the party bringing a civil action in England 4. plaintiff - the party bringing a civil action in USA, also in Estonia 5. defendant - the party against whom a civil action is started 6. defence (counsel) – protection of smb in the civil proceeding 7. prosecution – the party bringing a criminal action 8. inadmissible evidence – the evidence that is not possible to take into account 9. tracking system of claims – certain 3-level system to determine which court should hear a case 10. burden of proof – obligation to bring evidence 11. standards of proof – the level of reliability of the evidence used in the case 12. adversarial procedure – opposing parties hold a dispute in the procedure 13. inquisitorial procedure – the judge controls and starts
while another equally indignant writer called it a "misguided effort to protect stu- dents from the truth" (Barhaugh, 2008). The term official censorship usually makes us think of bans on political or sex- ually explicit material, yet there is another common sort of official censorship that we don't think of in the same way, probably because it occurs after the fact. Often in a jury trial, a piece of evidence or testimony will be introduced, only to be ruled inadmissible by the presiding judge, who may then admonish the jurors to disre- gard that evidence. From this perspective, the judge may be viewed as a censor, though the form of the censorship is odd. The presentation of the information to the jury is not banned-too late for that-it's the jury's use of the information that is banned. How effective are such instructions from a judge? Is it possible that, for
annaabi.ee 
