between literary criticism and fiction. It offers four readings of Larkin’s “Deceptions” by four fictitious characters in the same university department: a formalist, a Marxist, a feminist and a post-structuralist critic. Holderness’s parodistic readings have a central position in the volume for precisely the same reason as Larkin’s “Posterity” does in High Windows. In the first place, the poem entitles the reader to see Larkin through the eyes of Jake Balokowsky, his fictitious biographer, but Larkin also ridicules this young cosmopolitan scholar. Holderness’s Cleanth, Raymond, Kate, and Colin are both serious and ludicrous. Holderness has created four possible scholars, and he does not say that any of them are wrong. He laughs at them, but does not reject their readings. In a Larkinesque manner, he wears the masks of four critics to demonstrate the diversity of Larkin criticism.
When setting-up a joint stock company the charter capital of company may be determined in any amount. Article 52. Types of shares. Other securities convertible into shares 1. Unless otherwise established by the statute, shares may be ordinary and preferred. One ordinary share provides a shareholder one voting right at a shareholders' general meeting. On the contrary, a preferred share does not grant a voting right. The preferred share entitles the shareholder to receive a dividend at an approved rate. Size of a dividend and the rule of its granting are defined by the Statute. A different rule may be stipulated by the Statute that suggests different definition of the rights of ordinary and preferred shares. Shares of one class provide equal rights to their holders. Promise on unrestricted granting of dividends is invalid. Article 53. Rights and Obligations of Shareholders 1
ognize it to be-a compliance tactic. Once this is done, there would be no pressure to offer the names as a return concession, since the reduced request would not be viewed as a real concession. At this point, unhampered by an inappropriately trig- gered sense of obligation, you may once again be as compliant or noncompliant as you wish. Provided you are so inclined, you might even turn the inspector's own weapon of influence against him. Recall that the rule for reciprocation entitles a person who has acted in a certain way to a dose of the same thing. If you have determined that the "fire inspector's" gifts were used , not as genuine gifts, but to make a profit from READER'S REPORT 2.4 From a Former Television and Stereo Salesperson F or quite a while, I worked for a major retailer in their television and stereo department. Continued employment was based on the ability to sell ser-