your friend go the same school. It would be easier to recognize people with their uniforms. Uniforms also prepare you for your future life, when you often have to dress smart when you go to work. It is a lot easier to dress every morning because you do not have to choose between different sets of clothes. You will have only one to choose the uniform. However, I think, that students should not wear uniforms. Wearing uniforms will make individuality dissapear and as a result we would have a group of students in grey or blue uniforms. We could not express ourselves by what we wear. The uniforms are also quite boring and not very inviting. School should be a happy place to be, but the dull colour makes you feel like you have come to prison. It may look nice and smart but it does not make stundents happy. Uniforms are quite often uncomfortable to wear, which makes them even worse. To sum up, I would say that stundents should not wear uniforms
Opponents of this view say that the competition is not necessary, because we can not compare due to the fact that we all are different. Even in nature there is nothing exactly the same. Also, people have different skills- somebody can sing well, the other person is an excellent communicator, and the third is good in mathematics. How to tell who is the most talented? To sum up, there are several good and also many bad sides of competition. In my opinion competiton will not dissapear , it is part of our everyday life and also it is essential if we are able to use it sensibly.
have to keep the ones you love, close to you. She also realizes that it's bad to lie. Positive aspects is for an example that you can learn a lot from this film. Like that there is no point in lying, because every lie grows bigger and bigger until it consumes everything and goes out of control. And every lie comes out in the future. The second thing is that you can't keep running from your mistakes. You have to face them if you want to get over them and make them dissapear. this film is also very well-written. I'm sure the director thought it through many times before he started making it. In fact, I really like one point in the movie: it's tjhat there is the perfect man for everyone. Sometimes you just have to look for him. And if you find hin, you can't let him go. On negative side I can point out that at some points it seemed a little unreal. Like in real life it's quite impossible that all the machines in the kitchen break at the
they’re willing to do anything, that could save them from punishment, then they can come up with many creative ways to make the situation better. So now I have to agree with Ken again, we don’t grow into creativity, we grow out of it. Also only hope for better future is to adopt a new conception of human ecology. We should re-think the ways we are living now, most important the ways we are teaching kids to handle the future. Because like Jonas Salk quoted: „If all the insects were to dissapear from the earth, within 50 years all life on Earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the Earth, within 50 years all forms of life would flourish.“ Ken Robinson made this speech in 2006. Right now it’s 2015. In nine years the world has been developed a bit, but not enough to make a future a better place for our kids. Like Ken sayd: „We may not see the future, but they will.“
of the problem of theorizing without empirical basis, recognizing the appearance of irrationality that such an enterprise exhibits and criticizing Herder for extracting conclusions from speculative pyschologizing). 9 thesises are posted to prove that rational and moral autonomy will defeat the compulsions of self-interested individualism. In a future state there will be a lot of freedom. I thesis Unnecessary parts of the society will naturaly dissapear. II thesis Man (one) can not learn to use hes reason. Society can. III thesis Nature has not made our society to grow more complex thanks to the previous generations, who have built our society. But nature gave us our minds, that we were able to use to work out this complex society and happiness. IV thesis The same force, that drives us to progress, has also arranged us in the order within a society. Nature urges us to rise above other men. Also to remove us from lifestile of sloth and laziness
Publikumenu ja etenduste populaarsus ei ole 100% ette prognoositav. SUMMARY Aadu Kadakas (2018). Of Rakvere Teater's drain points by the last three years. Research. Kükametsa Gymnasium. Manuscript. Kükametsa. 35 pages, 18 used sources of literature, 11 tables, 2 extras. The purpose of the presented research is to find out Rakvere Teater's drain points during the last three years. The author of the research is interested if the theater is fading art and will dissapear soon, or some of the shows will remain in the hearts and memories of the public. Based on the purpose of the research, the author has stated the following research questions: to find out what's the best show and who's the best actor based on public's opinion; to find out public's preferences on show genres; to figure out how often is theatre being visited and what does it depend on. Both, quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the research. The survey was
We know something by interpreting it, by decoding it, the whole world is a text in postmodernity. In modernism everything is more or less separate, individual entitiys, in postmodernism everything is interconnected, itnerrelated, intertextuality. The influence of earlier texts or later texts, another important feature is the attitude of death. Death in postmoderism, death is meaningful, even after death the self does not dissapear completely. In modernism there was collective memory, remembering, in postmodernism there is amnesia, loss of memory. Thats why in postmodernism it is important to discover what is lost. Decentering of history, we get new historys instead. Postcolonial period is new history, feminist theory. In feminism there is decentering of the male subject. In postmodernism history is ongoing and neverending, whatever shuts down discourse means death.