This thesis is written in Estonian, it consists of 55 pages. It references to 91 sources, which includes literature, legislation and legal practice, 77 of the sources are in Estoninan and 13 in foreign language. The thesis is written following deductive method. The aim of this thesis is to determin the constitutionality of restrictive measures established by the Imprisonment Act article 90 sections 3 and 5. A hypothesis was set that the restrictive measures established to the detainees by the Imprisonment Act article 90 sections 3 and 5 are not in accordance with The Constitution of the Republic of Estonia articles 19, 20, 26 and 34. An importante incentive on choice of subject was that the topic is problematic and actual with reference to the letter sent by Chancellor of Justice to the Minister of Justice in which the Chancellor of Justice questions the constitutionality of Imprisonment Act Article 90 Sections
political or other opinion. Those whose rights were infringed did not have any remedies and couldn't have them either because if they were to claim them, the judges/ courts giving them are not competent in the sense that they're not independent or impartial. Article 6 right to life. Violated with the people who disappeared (political opposition). Article 7: A demonstrator, a woman, was hit in the face by a public official. Letting the detainees stand in the cold against a wall; beating the people while arresting them. This can constitute as torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Also there was some talk about setting the protesters' tents on fire at some point (another protest) and some people died in that fire. The police never did investigate it properly so no-one knows who did it. Article 9 (1) (2) (4) (5) People in the square were arbitrarily arrested and kept in prison
annaabi.ee 
