tingimustes. b) kogemistingimused? Epistemoloogias: asjad paistavad erinevates tingimustes erinevalt. Esteetikas: Kunstiteoste õige vaatamine (hindamine, jms) eeldab õigeid kogemustingimusi (sõltuvad kunstiajaloolistest asjaoludest jms) (Ziff 1964) Psühholoogilised tingimused (purjus, "narkos") Füüsiline tingimused (pime ruum) NB! Eri hinnangud tulenevad sellest, et hindajad eeldavad (sageli enese teadmata) erinevaid kogemistingimusi (Zemach 1997). Objekti kogemistingimused: Objektide "võimekus" olla E-hoiaku objekt sõltub kogemustingimustest. Päike saab loojangu olukorras olla E-hoiaku objekt, ent mitte päikese pinnal olles. Ründavat tiigrit ei saa võtta E-hoiaku objektiks, kui turvalisus on ohus (st loomaaias saab). ,,ninapidi raipes" olles vb ei saa raibet võtta esteetiliselt, ent binoklist või raipe kirjelduse (nt Baudelaire ,,Raibe") suhtes saab. 8. Milles seisneb võimatute objektide etteheide? 3
· Kvart (1993) also elaborates a version of the CausalHistorical Theory of referring. · Evans (1973) offers further objections to Kripke's picture, and an interesting revision of it. Evans (1982) makes concessions to Kripke but insists that the idea of a "name-using (social) practice" must be introduced as a further element. McKinsey (1976, 1978) has moved 62 Reference and referring further back toward the ancien régime. Further objections are made by Erwin, Kleiman and Zemach (1976) and Linsky (1977). · Salmon (1981) surveys semantic views of kind terms. Schwartz (1977) contains relevant papers. Criticisms of the KripkePutnam line are offered by Fine (1975), Dupré (1981), Unger (1983), and others. Boër (1985) responds to some of those criticisms. · The impact of "Twin Earth" examples on the theory of meaning gen- erally is explored in Harman (1982) and Lycan (1984: ch. 10). Part II Theories of meaning 5 Traditional theories of meaning Overview
annaabi.ee 
