. valicla käivitusmomendi suurust. Su.jrivkäivitr-rse peamiseks eeļiseks traditsiooIriļisįe käivitusviisidega võrręļdes oll aga võittraļus pidurdusrambi kuju nirrg valida įaindlikult iuhtida käivitusralnįri 'ia se,da vastavaļt töörrrasina või teĻroloogia vajaclr-rstele. Ütcņunut kastttaįakse s{rrvkäivittrst kõiŲal, kus seni rakerrdati tavalisi käivitussįisįeen]e. Sujuvkäiviti puhul on võinralik otsevõrktrkäivitusega võrreldes saavutacla nraksinraaļselt kirni 80 % nrootori nirnikäivitt"lsmomenclist. Lisagetn, įt astirrkroontrrootori käivittrsrlollleIlt oI] tavaliseļt 1,5
ance meanings of its ultimate parts. Only then will the core Gricean idea, and (crucially) his analysis of utterance meaning for a group, be invoked as explicating the utterance meanings of the parts. I emphasize "abstract resultant procedure," because very few of those "abstract" procedures will ever actually occur. And it is that feature that will help Grice with obstacles 23. For the theme of those obstacles is that unut- tered and novel sentences do not correspond to any actual speaker-meanings. But at least arguably, they do correspond to the hypothetical speaker-mean- ings that would be generated by Grice's abstract resultant procedures. The appeal to abstract procedures may also help to overcome obstacle 4: Even though a certain sentence's literal meaning is never matched by any actual speaker-meaning, it may still correspond to a hypothetical resultant speaker- meaning.