basis in which there are only two main parties that are going to come out on top. Although this appears to be a functioning democracy, this is simply another grand narrative that large sections of the public have become apathetic or seemingly abeyant. Two clear examples that have highlighted the weakness of the limited government paradigm and have ultimately lead to the disillusionment of many within this society. The first is the decision to invade Iraq on the grounds of unproven evidence, in spite of the huge public opposition. Secondly is the scandal over MP's expenses claims as it was legitimate for politicians to make invoices for things such as claiming for second homes in order to maximise personal profits. This gave out a clear message that it was one rule for the public and an entirely different set of more lenient ones for the members' of parliament or as David Peace (2004, p. 164) asserts one rule for us, no rules for them.
Everything has to come from something or everything has to come from nothing? We have no experience of everything coming from nothing. Logically everything comes from something. Something from which everything comes, is that something or nothing? It has to come from something. What that "something" is is beyond the scope of modern scientists to know. Scriptures tell us that this is GOD. That God is Krishna. Science can't tell how & from where everything came about. They have unproven speculations. Logically we are not able to prove that Krishna is God because logic has it's limits. But logically we can establish that everything has to come from something. And that something is controlling everything & owning everything. ONE'S QUOTA IN NATURE (P 5) Cow gives milk bu eats grass and straw. Lion will not eat grass, cow will not eat flesh. Within nature all beings follow the pattern which are set by nature. Cow is not a dead machine or petrol tank