areas, competition is inevitable. Functionalists act like all parts in society are equal and there is little talk about individualism, which might explain, why they ignore conflict between different groups. People differ from each other financially, mentally and physically and they all want best for themselves which in my opinion leads to competing. For example, human behaviour in functionalism is shown as being shaped by the social system but in spite of most people being socialised into traditional gender norms, people develop other identities and keep up the levels of criminality, even though they are taught to obey the law. All in all, both theories have their ups and downs and I believe people could argue about which is right forever. As well as people are different, they also develop different views of society and it is hard to prove some theory completely right.
inequality in the distribution of income and property that we still tolerate. We can only remove this evil by abolishing property as a main source of income for anyone. To do this, it will be necessary to modify the right of inheritance so that it is only possible to pass comparatively small sums of money or nothing at all from generation to generation. Private monopolistic control will bring into existence a better balanced and a more securely progressive economy. A socialised industry should be owned by the State and its technical management remain responsible to the nation. But it should retain all the advantages of small enterprise: plants that are small enough to be managed efficiently. With knowledge would come power. Better educated men and women, freed from the bonds of social subservience, would see more clearly the society in which they wished to live and guide more firmly the conduct of democratic policy by which alone their hopes can slowly be
annaabi.ee 
