Such animals would be beavers, bats, geese, deer, pigeons, mice, raccoons, snakes, chipmunks, squirrels, bears, coyotes, ducks, foxes, mountain lions, prairie dogs, rabbits, and even wolves. So their view on hunting is negative. [9] Animal Aid is animal rights organization in United Kingdom, founded in 1977. They do campaigns against all forms of cruelty against animals. They lobby politicians, make undercover investigations into slaughterhouses, factory farms and horse racing industry. If they find anything it is given to media or used in campaigns. Animal Aid considers all hunting to be more cruel than necessary; they have been and are especially against fox hunting with hounds. In UK fox hunting with hounds has been traditional way of hunting for nobility, but in 2005 Animal Aid organization managed to get the legal ban of the usage of hounds in fox hunts. [1]
Main reason can be poor knowledge about veganism. They expressed strongly their negative opinion about it in answers they gave. In this research I presented two main questionswhich strongly support the research problem. First question was whether and under what conditions would students be prepared to return to the omnivorous community. The survey shows that students would turn back to eating meat if the quality of producing meat products would be better. Perhaps better machines, cleaner slaughterhouses, employees know about hygiene etc. Second thing what students bring out was if someone could prove that vegan food is somehow unhealthy and doesn't do good for your body. When they get a solid assurance from scientists and doctors who say "Yes, veganism and vegan diet are bad for your health", they will return to omnivorous lifestyle. Unfortunately this statement is not proved yet. There are doctors who talk about veganism as how bad it is for health but then again others
annaabi.ee 
