On the other hand, a man named Erik Olin Wright had a different set of mind. Firstly, Karl Marx thought that proletariat was more powerful than bourgeoisie, because he believed, that if there would be a revolution one day, then it would be carried out by the proletariat. In work, Marx saw a form of human self-expression, which the capitalist mode of production did not allow to develop. He claimed, that the pressure would arise interest in economics and politcs among the proletariats so they could take over power, fight against the injustices the bourgeoisie carry out against them and finally free the society from class differentiaton. Secondly, in my opinion, Erik Olin Wright definitely did not think the same. While reading Wright’s thougths and understanding a bit more of his point of view, I could almost believe, that Karl Marx saw the world through his own perfection. Seemed to me, that Wright thought about other parties
See oli tingitud ka sellest, et aeg oli teine ning inimeste maailmavaated olid mõnevõrra muutunud, mistõttu ei kohaldunud traditsioonilise realismi vaadetega. Piret Jänes 111827RIRIB Kasutatud allikad: · Elman, C. (2007). Realism. M. Griffiths (Toim). International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century (lk 11-14). Routledge, London and New York. · Forde, S. (1995). International Realism and the Science of Politcs: Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Neorealism. International studies Quarterly, 39, nr. 2, (lk 141-160). Wiley-Blackwell kirjastus. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600844 · Priess, D., Schweller, R. L. (1997). A Tale of Two Realism: Expanding the Intitutions Debate. Mershon International Studies Review. Wiley-Blackwell kirjastus. http://www.jstor.org/stable/222801 · Morgenthau, H. J. (1978). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (lk 4-15).
annaabi.ee 
