Teadusfilosoofia – ja metodoloogia
Invisibility of Scientific Revolutions’. In this chapter Kuhn revisits the themes
developed in earlier chapters. He explains that the celebrated scientific
revolutions that he uses as examples are selected solely that the reader is
already familiar with them. Kuhn suggests in this chapter that revolutions are
invisible because of historical revisionism in science textbooks. His argument
runs along the following lines. Firstly assuming that scientists and laypeople use
textbooks as the primary source of learning about a scientific field then the
presentation of the field within the textbooks is of central importance. Secondly
Kuhn suggests that there is a central assumption that science is independent of
the historical context (note that he himself does not hold this view). Thirdly Kuhn
argues that when a revolution has occurred there is a need to rewrite the science
textbooks. This rewriting follows a pattern. Thus the central problems which were