« » « »[167] [168]. 2009 : «<...> , . -- , , , , , -- ,,"».[169]. : « . , , , . , , . , , , , , , .» [170] . . « : » , , [171]. , 2007 , 2006 2 ., 3,7 . , 1500 . - 78 . [172]. . , Die Welt 12 2007 [173][174], . « 37 % ,,", $20 . , 4,5 % ,,". Gunvor, , [175] 50 %. $40 , -- $8 ». « »[176], , , , , , , , . The Guardian 2007 . : «, . . -- () . , -, -.»[177][178] 2008 , « , , , », -- : «, », , « , »; « »[179]. 2009 (1996-- 1997) . . day.az : «, , . , . , , , 40 .»[180][181] 1999 ( , , , 14 % 1999 79 % 2007)
relevant sensors, most of the time operators product quality. This is still difficult to also use their know-how to decide when to achieve because different raw materials (i.e., stop the chopping process. Curt et al. (2004a, meat trimmings and animal fat) show a large b) proposed a method to assess the batter variability in their biochemical and func- state at the end of chopping using operator tional properties (Gunvor et al. 2005). knowledge. At-line sensory measurements Most of the studies aimed to optimize performed by the expert (fat particle size, emulsion quality through formulation. size homogeneity, firmness, and adhesive- Different optimization methods were used. Emulsification 161 Table 7.3. Methods to Assess Meat Emulsion Properties