CLOSING KALARAND FOR PUBLIC
The best
way to solve it is sueing the company and City Council should be the one who would stand
for the public interest. Armuneeme case is a good example how doing nothing can escalate the
situation from bad to the worst. If Tallinn wants to be known as a maritime town, then the
City Council should fight for keeping the seaside open for public, as required by the Estonian
law.
6
References:
Garlick, S. (2015) “The battle for the Estonian coastline” The Baltic Times, 5.August
ETA. (2001 ) “Pro Kapital ostis Kalaranna ASi” Delfi, 18.May
Accessible: http://arileht.delfi.ee/news/uudised/pro-kapital-ostis-kalaranna-asi?id=50881531
Klemeni, K. (2011) “Kalarand, the sea and the public interest.” Estonian Art, Vol. 27, Issue 2,
p. 36-39.
Kuusk, H.(2015) “Rand või sadam? Tallinna Kalaranna ujumiskoht suletakse sadama nime
all.” Eesti Päevaleht, 07.August.
annaabi.ee 
