Eelarvamused: kuuluvusgrupi eelistamine: Ingroup favoritism effect: IG > OG WHY - resource competition, historical memory, rewards for self Favoritism: "Because people typically want to maintain positive self-regard, they are motivated to have favorable evaluations of the groups to which they belong. But there is no objective yardstick for gauging the desirability of any particular social group: such comparisons are inherently subjective. Therefore, people enhance their own group's favorability by psychologically establishing its relative superiority in comparison with some out-group. Thus, people are motivated to accentuate the evaluative difference between the ingroup and outgroup.“ (Hamilton and Sherman, 1994) Eelarvamuste väljendus käitumises – diskrimineerimine. Kas olete kohanud? Kas on põhjendatud? Stereotüübid ja eelarvamused – sotsiaalsed filtrid Sarnasused- erinevused • Stereotüüp - Stereotypes – Domineerib - Cognitive component
Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York, NY. Kissinger, H. (1982). Years of upheaval. Boston: Little, Brown. Knishinsky, A (1982). The effects of scarcity of material and exclusivity of information on in- dustrial buyer perceived risk in provoking a purchase decision. Unpublished doctoral dis- sertation, Arizona State University, Tempe. Knouse, S. B. (1983). The letter of recommendation: Specificity and favorability informa- tion. Personal Psychology, 36, 331-341. Knox, R. E., 8{ Inkster, J. A (1968). Postdecisional dissonance at post time. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 8, 319-323. Kraut, R. E. (1973). Effects of social labeling on giving to charity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 551-562. Kruglanski, A E., 8{ Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Ef-
annaabi.ee 
