acess to the court system to regulate competence (pädevude regulatsioon) - to control or adjust adequacy professional examination (ametialne eksam) - a test taken in order to get qualification for certain occupation preparorty course (ettevalmistus kursus) - a class which will prepear person for certain subject's examination to sue somebody (kedagi kohtusse kaebama) - to file a lawsuit agains someone who commited a crime to be impartial (erapooletu) - to treat rivals or disputants equally to prove quilt (süüd tõestama) - to demonstrate the truth of that someone has commited a special offence or crime to transfer (ülekandma) - to move, carry or transport from one person or place to another original court (algupärane kohus, I astme kohus) - the court where case is heard for the first time appellate court (apellatsioonikohus) - higher level court which hears the appeals from orginal court jurisdiction (kohtualluvus) - the power or authority to decide legal cases
that was ridden by Bellerophon. 2 However, do not think that Russell's theory is only a variant of Frege's. There are several important differences between the two, and they make for different sets of strengths and weaknesses. 3 In Chapter 2 we defined the notion of a description's semantic denotatum/ referent, and someone might suggest that this provides the needed point of contact between our two disputants. But that would ignore the fact that there is no incompatibility whatever between Russell's (7) and (8). Improving on Russell, a later descriptivist might put the Name Claim in terms of descriptions used referentially, and appeal to the fact noted in our discussion of Donnellan that communication goes by speaker-referent rather than semantic referent. That would introduce a notion of "disagreement" between speakers that is weaker than clash of semantic content.
annaabi.ee 
