Kaasaegne teaduslik mõtlemine ja filosoofilised meetodid
T F F T T T T
(4) And (5) are not incompatible. That’s Joe’s error.
A logical experiment
On the way, Joe was claiming that Carr was necessarily in the shop.
Suppose Joe and Jim arrived at the shop.
Question:
What does the actual presence or absence of Carr teach Joe about his claim?
Case 1: Carr was in the shop. It confirms but does not prove Joe’s claim.
Case 2: Carr was not in the shop. It disconfirms and disproves Joe’s claim.
Confirmation and disconfirmation reasoning as essential in scientific method.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conditions
When we say that A is a condition for B, three meanings are possible:
1. A is a Sufficient condition for B.
The occurence of A requires the occurence of B
Ex