give money to help keep their enlisted staff on half pay. A German spray for gooseberry mildew was, meanwhile, blacklisted. The 1915 Show was a sad affair, with steady rain, mud underfoot, and waterfalls from the tent roof. The railway companies had been quite incapable of delivering the essential rocks and plants on time for the Show, so exhibitors had found other ways to bring them to Chelsea. Lady Dundas, a charitable fund raiser for war victims, arranged for Viscount Dalrymple, then a small boy, to parade around the grounds on a Shetland pony to collect money for the war. The RHS, which in 1911 refused to allow ladies banquets, now recognized that lady gardeners existed, and acknowledged the necessity to dig for victory. In 1915 it even organized a show of women's work at the Horticultural Halls. As the war deepened, the RHS struggled on. By November the Council had removed King Ferdinand of Bulgaria as an honorary fellow and, the following February,
4.2 “Veenmise” tegelaste iseloomustus Alljärgnevas loetelus iseloomustan “Veenmise” pea- ja tähtsamaid kõrvaltegelasi. Nagu “Uhkuse ja eelarvamuse” tegelaste iseloomustuste puhul kasutasin ka siin tsitaate, et anda tegelaste isiksust selgemini edasi. Anne Elliot on “Äärmiselt kena neiu, kellel ei puudunud ei õrnus, tagasihoidlikkus, hea maitse ega ka tunded’’ (lk 24). Ta häbeneb isa, Sir Walteri ja õe Elizabethi lipitsevat käitumist (pugemine leedi Dalrymple´ile ja preili Carterile lk 130). Anne´i ei panda kodus tähele, peres ei küsita tema arvamust: “Isa ja õe jaoks tühi koht - oli nii isa kui õe jaoks eikeegi: tema sõnal polnud mingit kaalu,temalt oodati alati järeleandlikkust- ta oli ju kõigest Anne’’ (Autori märkus lk 7). Uppercrossis õde Mary juures on Anne seevastu väga hinnatud seltskonnakaaslane, kes kuulab kannatlikult teiste muresid ja on tihti lepitavaks lüliks.
milligrams, half of what had been ordered; (4) the directive was given by a man the nurse had never met, seen, or even talked with before on the phone. Yet, in 95 per- cent of the instances, the nurses went straight to the ward medicine cabinet where they secured the ordered dosage of Astrogen and started for the patient's room to administer it. It was at this point that they were stopped by a secret observer, who revealed the nature of the experiment (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, 8z Pierce, 1966). The results are frightening indeed. That 95 percent of regular staff nurses com- plied unhesitatingly with a patently improper instruction of this sort must give us all as potential hospital patients great reason for concern. What the midwestern study shows is that the mistakes are hardly limited to the trivial slips in the ad- ministration of harmless ear drops or the like, but extend to grave and dangerous blunders.
annaabi.ee 
