polished by the rhythmic coming and going of the waves, I am certain to recognize the internal geometry of nature." 1951-1965 · 1951-1965 Gordes'e töödest edasiarenenud liikumisega seotud mustvalged fotod. Nnede peaale paigutatakse akrüül-klaaspaneelid ning tänu sellele muutub pilt sõltuvalt vaataja vaatenurgast. · Tegeles kintteilisuse ja vibratsiooni põhitõdedega "Vega" (1957) · Kunstnik ise "painting and sculpture become anachronistic terms: it's more exact to speak of bi-, tri- and multidimensional plastic art. We no longer have distinct manifestations of a creative sensibility, but the development of a single plastic sensibility in different spaces." · "Movement does not rely on composition nor a specific subject, but on the apprehension of the act of looking, which by itself is considered as the only creator." Veel optilise kunsti näiteid · https://youtu.be/-IWk5NkxQF8?t=10s Tänan kuulamast!
Stonehenge was produced by a culture with no written language, and at great historical remove from the first cultures that did leave written records. Many aspects of Stonehenge remain subject to debate. This multiplicity of theories, some of them very colourful, is often called the "mystery of Stonehenge." There is little or no direct evidence for the construction techniques used by the Stonehenge builders. Over the years, various authors have suggested that supernatural or anachronistic methods were used, usually asserting that the stones were impossible to move otherwise. However, conventional techniques using Neolithic technology have been demonstrably effective at moving and placing stones this size.[10] Proposed functions for the site include usage as an astronomical observatory, or as a religious site. Other theories have advanced supernatural or symbolic explanations for the construction. More recently two major new theories have been proposed
significant wear. Stonehenge was produced by a culture that left no written records. Many aspects of Stonehenge remain subject to debate. This multiplicity of theories, some of them very colourful, are often called the "mystery of Stonehenge". There is little or no direct evidence for the construction techniques used by the Stonehenge builders. Over the years, various authors have suggested that supernatural or anachronistic methods were used, usually asserting that the stones were impossible to move otherwise. However, conventional techniques using Neolithic technology have been demonstrably effective at moving and placing stones of a similar size. Proposed functions for the site include usage as an astronomical observatory, or as a religious site. More recently two major new theories have been proposed. Professor Geoffery Wainwright
patriotism and nationalism, Kantorek's physical description groups him with premodern evil characters. The fierce and pompous Kantorek is a small man described as "energetic and uncompromising," characteristics that recall the worried Caesar's remarks about Cassius in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar: "Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look. / He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous" (I.ii.195196). Napoleon also springs to mind as a historical model for Kantorek. The inclusion of a seemingly anachronistic literary type--the scheming or dangerous diminutive man--may seem out of place in a modern novel. Yet this quality of Kantorek arguably reflects the espousal of dated ideas by an older generation of leaders who betray their followers with manipulations, ignorance, and lies. "While they taught that duty to one's country is the greatest thing," Paul writes in Chapter One, "we already knew that death-throes are stronger
annaabi.ee 
