Keelefilosoofia raamat
He might have
apprenticed himself at age twelve to a sandalmaker and gone on to make
sandals all his life, never going anywhere near politics or public life at all
and never once getting his name in any newspaper. Yet, obviously, it is not
possible that a person who satisfies a SBVAUN of the description cluster
associated with "Richard Nixon" nonetheless does not satisfy any at all of
the descriptions in that cluster. On Searle's view, the character who went into
sandalmaking would not have been the referent of "Richard Nixon" and for
that matter would not have been Richard Nixon. And that seems wrong.
Michael Dummett (1973) has protested that objection 3 is simply invalid as
it stands; at least, it rests on a hidden false assumption. We may infer that our
modal question is synonymous with (9) only by assuming that, if "Richard
40 Reference and referring
Nixon" is equivalent to a description at all, it is equivalent to one that has nar-