Cialdini raamat
turers' complex argument was contradictory, illogical, and unsupportable. The ef-
fect on the discussion leaders was devastating. After a confused silence, each
attempted a weak reply only to halt midway to confer with his partner and finally
to admit that my colleague's points were good ones "requiring further study."
More interesting to me, though, was the effect upon the rest of the audience.
At the end of the question period, the two recruiters were faced with a crowd of au-
dience members submitting their $75 down payments for admission to the TM
program. Nudging, shrugging, and chuckling to one another as they took in the
payments, the recruiters betrayed signs of giddy bewilderment. After what ap-
peared to have been an embarrassingly clear collapse of their presentation, the
meeting had somehow turned into a great success, generating mystifyingly high
levels of compliance from the audience. Although more than a bit puzzled, I