Keelefilosoofia raamat
champions of theories are remarkably good at avoiding or refuting objec-
tions. The real theorizing begins where this book leaves off.
x Preface
I have used some notation of formal logic, specifically the predicate calcu-
lus, for those who are familiar with it and will find points made clearer by it.
But in each case I have also explained the meaning in English.
Many of the writings to be discussed in this book can be found in the
following anthologies: T. Olshewsky (ed.), Problems in the Philosophy of
Language (Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969); J. F. Rosenberg
and C. Travis (eds.) Readings in the Philosophy of Language (Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971); D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), The
Logic of Grammar (Encino, CA: Dickenson, 1975); R. M. Harnish (ed.) Basic
Topics in the Philosophy of Language (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
1994); A. Martinich (ed.) The Philosophy of Language, 5th edn. (Oxford:
annaabi.ee 
