Vajad kellegagi rääkida?
Küsi julgelt abi LasteAbi
Logi sisse
Sulge

"nankas" - 1 õppematerjal

Keelefilosoofia raamat
234
pdf

Keelefilosoofia raamat

at once. Shakespeare could mean as many as five different things in a single utterance. 3 It did not come chronologically first, but was presented in Grice (1968). 4 In particular, let us confine the discussion to declarative sentences, though Grice was careful to address imperatives and others as well. 5 Yes, it has. Can you believe that? 6 One possible fix, suggested to me by the late Wendy Nankas, is to talk not just of activation but of reinforcement. 7 Ziff's case is strongly similar to an example of J. O. Urmson's regarding thumbscrews, discussed by Grice (1969: 152­3). In response, Grice offered what he labels "Redefinition I"; but I have never seen exactly how that redefinition was supposed to rule out this kind of counterexample. There is a set of examples begun in conversation by Dennis Stampe, Stephen Schiffer, and P. F. Strawson,

Filosoofia → Filosoofia
48 allalaadimist


Sellel veebilehel kasutatakse küpsiseid. Kasutamist jätkates nõustute küpsiste ja veebilehe üldtingimustega Nõustun