the oats. Suddenly William heard a shot and everything was covered in smoke. Hugh had pulled the trigger, but there was nothing in the field. After that William heard two extremely different voices: a scream like that of a wild animal and Morgan crying out as if in mortal agony. He gazed at Hugh and it seemed like his body was split into pieces. When he approached the body, his companion was dead. The jury can't believe that an invisible force could do something like that, so one juror asks: „From what asylum did you escape?“ The witness feels insulted by that comment and starts to leave. Just before going out of the door he sees coroner reading the victim's diary and asks for a permission to reveal Morgan's writings, but the coroner denies his request. At the end of the meeting jury decides that the victim was slaughtered by a mountain lion. But the diary is still revealed by a third person. Although some pages are torn out, it has certain
a lofty initial commitment that is designed to spur future consistent behavior. When screening potential jurors before a trial, Jo-Ellen Demitrius, the woman cur- rently reputed to be the best consultant in the business of jury selection asks an art- ful question: "If you were the only person who believed in my client's innocence, could you withstand the pressure of the rest of the jury to change your mind?" How could any self-respecting prospective juror say no? And, having made the public promise, how could any self-respecting selected juror repudiate it later? Perhaps an even more crafty commitment technique has been developed by telephone solicitors for charity. Have you noticed that callers asking you to con- tribute to some cause or another these days seem to begin things by inquiring about your current health and well-being? "Hello, Mr./Ms. Targetperson," they say. "How are you feeling this evening
annaabi.ee 
