Keelefilosoofia raamat
they were proper names.)
2 See again Lewis (1986) and Lycan (1994).
3 See, for example, Heil and Mele (1993).
Chapter 11
1 The distinctions developed here are fairly traditional. But recently there has been
some dispute over the best way(s) in which to draw the semanticspragmatics
distinction in particular. See, for example, Bach (2002) and Bezuidenhout
(2002).
2 It is further developed in chapter 3 of Lycan (1984).
3 This was once pointed out to me by Peter van Inwagen.
4 This treatment of tense is a fudge, for convenience; for a fuller treatment of
tense, see Lycan (1984: 5562).
5 This presupposes that deictic elements are somehow marked as such in logical
form.
6 There is a more serious objection to it as well, pointed out by Burge (1974).
198 Notes
Chapter 12
1 Austin took propositional content nearly for granted. He strongly opposed
entity theories, so by "locutionary content" he did not mean anything about
propositions as things
annaabi.ee 
