& W. 394 (1820), where an injunction was granted against making any use of communicating certain recipies for veterinary medicine. The worker had access to his employer's recipies book and copied them. The personal writings and any productions of the intellect are private and is therefore protected. In addition they say that the right to privacy does not prohibit any publication of matter witch is of public or general interest. They emphasized that the scope of this rule covers those persons hwo are not public figures and hwo are dragged into an undesirable publicity. Therefore there is a value in preventing publication not only in the right to publicate. But, the right to privacy does not apply when the court of justice is concerned ofcourse. So in my opinion, the center of privacy issues is moved from greedy jornalists, mentioned in article from year 1890, to Google and other data collectors alike. If you want complete privacy, its easy, go to live in the Moon
S# #}i#pS(%m[R|
oV J/#
#Rr]cu#2}N#FSkpj6FxeWV"#0# =#|
~#h'#:#xvbXiII`Fx###9~
_#v(~j~#I+-mU/&{D
##kq+w#5 #
U#|)`h
Y
g$c#
WIJ?z7TbT,#(
~F#rj ?%?o%i|v|K7 ##]" J]E5n
E
WwK#~#[|/HW?
lu#[O
[[S#l2iMn>;y]
#/ oe
Gy'DK
"!##N#V
8*
}% }OPU###~# H 9# #v0@C
8|mH.#::>iNU$e#N#W; ?#C+
# L>#.#`{y`dK"zC!l0}Swl|c[]-
|.E}/#o#"},60Ka
`FGU_vx#/##^v)3I_d!#OJ;1#a;#"
annaabi.ee 
