To: Environmental protection agency From: Subject: Wind power versus oil shale Date: September 22 Wind power vs oil shale Introduction The purpose of this report is to analyse if wind power is better than power which is produced from oil shale. The report is based on EWPA (Estonian Wind Power Association) article which is published on their web page. Wind power It is said that the wind power is the most expensive source of power, but this statement is not plausible, because the recourse -wind- is for free. Calculations have shown that if new oil shale blocks were built, it would cost 3473 million EEK in a year per capita. On the other hand, if wind power were renewed in similar amount, it would cost only 868 million EEK per capita in a year
KASUTATUD ALLIKAD [1] “Tuuleenergia ajalugu ning inimeste suhtumine enne ja pärast tuulepargi püstitamist”, 2005. [Võrgumaterjal]. [Kasutataud 26. okt, 2014] [2] Tuuleenergia assotsiatsioon, "Tuuleenergia ajaloost” [Võrgumaterjal]. Available: http://www.tuuleenergia.ee/icap/?path=0x126x48. [kasutatud 25. okt, 2014]. [3] Kull, A. “Tuulik keset loodust?!”, Eesti Loodus nr 11. [4] Tuuleenergia assotsiatsioon, “ EWPA. Tuuleenergia,” [Võrgumaterjal]. Available: http://www.tuuleenergia.ee/about. [kasutatud 25.okt, 2014]. [5] Avamere tuuleparkide keskkonnamõjud ja nende hindamine. [6]Wikipedia, “Tuuleenergia, “, [Võrgumaterjal]. Available: http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuuleenergia#M.C3.B5ju_keskkonnale . [kasutatud 23.10.2014] [7]Eesti Loodus, “Avemere tuulepargid ja nende võimalik mõju kalastikule”, [Võrgumaterjal].
annaabi.ee 
