Vajad kellegagi rääkida?
Küsi julgelt abi LasteAbi
Logi sisse
Sulge

"duhemian" - 1 õppematerjal

Keelefilosoofia raamat
234
pdf

Keelefilosoofia raamat

Speech acts and illocutionary force 145 (4) I apologize. (5) I double. [A bid in bridge.] (6) Raise you five. [A bet in poker.] (7) Nay. [A vote on a formal motion.] Except possibly for the last two, these are declarative sentences, so (in particular) the verificationist must address them; what are their respective verification conditions? Perhaps that question is too hard, or unfair in view of Quine's Duhemian objection. But what are their truth conditions? We could direct T-sentences upon them. For example, "I promise to pay you for the diapers" is true if and only if I promise to pay you for the diapers. Really? (No, not really.) "I double" is true if and only if I double. Possibly; perhaps "I double," as said by me on the appropriate occasion, is true if and only if I do double on that occasion. But it seems that we are leav-

Filosoofia → Filosoofia
48 allalaadimist


Sellel veebilehel kasutatakse küpsiseid. Kasutamist jätkates nõustute küpsiste ja veebilehe üldtingimustega Nõustun